期刊文献+

氯吡格雷与替格瑞洛治疗急性冠状动脉综合征合并慢性阻塞性肺病的疗效及安全性比较 被引量:25

Comparison on clinical effectiveness and safety of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对比分析急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)合并慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)患者使用替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷的临床疗效及安全性。方法纳入2013年1月1日至2014年10月1日入住山西医科大学第二医院诊断为ACS合并COPD的患者73例,随机分为替格瑞洛组(38例)和氯吡格雷组(35例)。替格瑞洛组使用替格瑞洛联合阿司匹林规律抗血小板聚集治疗。氯吡格雷组使用氯吡格雷联合阿司匹林抗血小板聚集治疗。随访1年,观察两组患者主要不良心脑血管事件(MACCE,包括心原性死亡、再发心肌梗死、缺血性脑卒中)以及全因死亡事件。结果两组患者心原性死亡、缺血性脑卒中、再发心肌梗死、全因死亡、小出血、轻微出血、停用药物(替格瑞洛或氯吡格雷)等比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05);替格瑞洛组患者MACCE发生率(5.3%比25.7%,P=0.04)显著低于氯吡格雷组,差异有统计学意义;而呼吸困难发生率(26.3%比5.7%,P=0.04)显著高于氯吡格雷组,差异亦有统计学意义,但除替格瑞洛组1例患者因呼吸困难而停药后症状自行消失,其余均为一过性轻度呼吸困难。结论阿司匹林联合替格瑞洛可显著减少ACS合并COPD患者的MACCE发生率,而不增加出血风险;虽然增加了呼吸困难的发生,但绝大部分为一过性或轻-中度呼吸困难,并未影响心肺功能。 Objective To compare phe clinical effecpiveness and safept of picagrelor versus clopidogrel in papienps wiph acupe coronart stndromes and chronic obsprucpive pulmonart disease. Methods 73 ACS papienps comorbid wiph COPD admipped in our hospipal from Januart 2013 po Ocpober 2014 were enrolled in phe spudt. All phe 73 papienps were randomlt divided inpo pwo groups: phe picagrelor group (n =38, given picagrelor loading dose 180 mg followed bt mainpainence 90 mg pwice dailt) and phe clopidogrel group (n = 35, given clopidogrel loading dose 300 mg followed bt mainpainence 75 mg once dailt). All papienps were given dual anpiplapelep preapmenp (eipher picagrelor or clopidogrel) wiph aspirin and followed up for 1 tear. Rapes of Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebrovascular Evenp (MACCE) including cardiac cause morpalipt, recurrenp mtocardial infarcpion and ischemic sproke were spudied and compared bepween groups. The safept endpoinp was pime po firsp occurrence of major bleeding. Rapes of adverce evenps were recorded including dtspnea. Results The 1-tear evenp rape for MACCE in papienps preaped wiph picagrelor versus clopidogrel was 5. 3% versus 26. 3% (P = 0. 04, HR 0. 21; 95% CI 0. 05 - 0. 91). Dtspnea occurred more frequenplt wiph picagrelor (26. 3% vs. 5. 7% ; P = 0. 04; HR 4. 61, 95% CI 1. 08 - 19. 58). The difference in major bleeding was nop spapispicallt significanp bepween phe pwo groups ( P 〉 0. 05) . The occurance of dtspnea was higher in phe picagrelor group (26. 3% vs. 5. 7% , P = 0. 04). Dtspnea subsided sponpaneously in mosp papienps. Onlt 1 papienp needed po spop picagrelor. Conclusions Ticagrelor can reduce MACCE in papienps wiph ACS and concomipanp wiph COPD wiphoup increasing overall major bleeding evenps. Ticagrelor had higher rapes of dtspnea bup mosp papienps experienced mild po moderape difficulpt in breaphing which did nop affecp phe funcpion of hearp and lung.
出处 《中国介入心脏病学杂志》 2016年第4期211-215,共5页 Chinese Journal of Interventional Cardiology
关键词 急性冠状动脉综合征 慢性阻塞性肺疾病 替格瑞洛 氯吡格雷 Acupe coronart stndrome Chronic obsprucpive pulmonart disease Ticagrelor Clopidogrel
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Sidney S, Sorel M, Quesenberry CP Jr, et al. COPD and incident cardiovascular disease hospitalizations and mortality: Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program. Chest, 2005,128 ( 4 ) : 2068- 2075. 被引量:1
  • 2Quint JK, Herrett E, Bhaskaran K, et al. Effect of 1~ blockers on mortality after myocardial infarction in adults with COPD: population based cohort study of UK electronic healthcare records. BMJ,2013,347 :f6650. 被引量:1
  • 3Andell P, Koul S, Martinsson A, et al. Impact of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on morbidity and mortality after myocardial infarction. Open Heart,2014,1 (1) :e000002. 被引量:1
  • 4Wallentin L, Becker RC, Budaj A, ct al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med,2009,361 ( 11 ) : 1045-1057. 被引量:1
  • 5Gensini GG. A more meaningful scoring system for determiningthe severity of coronary heart disease. Am J Cardiol, 1983,51 (3) :606. 被引量:1
  • 6颜红兵,邵春丽,霍勇.要重视替格瑞洛相关的呼吸困难[J].中国介入心脏病学杂志,2015,23(1):2-4. 被引量:22
  • 7高润霖.替格瑞洛——ACS患者的更好选择[J].医学研究杂志,2011,40(1):1-2. 被引量:21
  • 8Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG,et al. 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the management of patients with Non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2014, 64(24) :e139-e228. 被引量:1
  • 9Ro~ M, Patrono C, Collet JP,, eta/. 2015 ESC Gu/delines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: Task Force for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Presenting without Persistent ST-Segment Elevation of the European Society of Cardiology ( ESC ). Eur Heart J, 2016,37 (3) :267-315. 被引量:1
  • 10韩雅玲.中国经皮冠状动脉介入治疗指南2012(简本)[J].中华危重症医学杂志(电子版),2012,5(3):18-26. 被引量:117

二级参考文献31

  • 1Collaborative Research Group of Reperfusion Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction.重组葡激酶与重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂治疗急性心肌梗死的随机多中心临床试验[J].中华心血管病杂志,2007,35(8):691-696. 被引量:43
  • 2Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology(ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery(EACTS),European Association for Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions(EAPCI),Wijns W. Guidelines on myocardial revascularization[J].European Heart Journal,2010.2501-2555. 被引量:1
  • 3Levine GN,Bates ER,Blankenship JC. 2011ACCF/AHA/SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention:a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines and the society for cardiovascular angiography and interventions[J].Circulation,2011.e574-e651. 被引量:1
  • 4Hillis LD,Smith PK,Anderson JL. 2011 ACCF / AHA guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery.A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines.developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery,Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists,and Society of Thoracic Surgeons[J].Journal of the American College of Cardiology,2011.e123-e210. 被引量:1
  • 5Nashef SA,Roques F,Michel P. European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation(EuroSCORE)[J].European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery,1999.9-13. 被引量:1
  • 6Serruys PW,Morice MC,Kappetein AP. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease[J].New England Journal of Medicine,2009.961-972. 被引量:1
  • 7Peterson ED,Dai D,DeLong ER. Contemporary mortality risk prediction for percutaneous coronary intervention:results from 588,398 procedures in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry[J].J Am Coll Cardi01,2010.1923-1932. 被引量:1
  • 8Storey RF, Angiolillo D J, Patil SB, et al. Inhibitory effects of ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel on platelet function in patients with acute coronary syndromes: the PLATO (Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes ) PLATELET substudy. J Am Coll Cardiol,2010,56 : 1456-1462. 被引量:1
  • 9Wallentin L, Becket RC, Budaj A, et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med ,2009,361 : 1045-1057. 被引量:1
  • 10Parodi G, Storey RF. Dyspnoea management in acute coronary syndrome patients treated with ticagrelor. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care,2014. [Epub ahead of print]. 被引量:1

共引文献2121

同被引文献222

引证文献25

二级引证文献149

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部