期刊文献+

软件平台开放度对主导企业绩效影响研究——基于平台吸引力的调节作用 被引量:9

An Empirical Study of the Effect of Software Platform Openness on the Dominant Enterprise Performance: From the Perspective of Moderator Role of Platform Appearance
原文传递
导出
摘要 从平台开放资源视角,探讨平台开放度对主导企业绩效的影响机理以及不同维度的平台吸引力对以上过程的调节作用。对中国31家软件平台及其主导企业相关数据的实证研究发现,平台开放广度对主导企业绩效有正向影响;平台开放深度对主导企业绩效呈倒U型影响;不同维度平台吸引力在平台开放度影响主导企业绩效过程中的调节作用不同。其中,平台服务水平正向调节开放广度对主导企业绩效的影响,但平台用户规模和商业变现能力未呈现这一作用;平台用户基数和商业变现能力正向调节平台开放深度对绩效的影响,但平台服务水平的负向调节假设只受部分支持。 From the perspective of open resources, the impact of platform openness on dominant enterprise performance and the moderating effect of platform appearance are discussed. Taking 31 software platform and their dominant enterprises as samples, experiential study finds that open breadth has positive effect on the performance of platform leader, while open depth has inverted U-shaped effect on it. The moderating effects of the platform appearance in different dimensions are different. In the process of open breadth affecting the performance of dominant enterprise, the service level plays positive moderating role, but the user scale and commercial liquidation ability don't present this role. The user scale and commercial liquidation ability positively moderate the impact of open depth on performance of dominant enterprises, but the negatively moderating effect of service level only partly support by the data.
作者 孙耀吾 旷冶
出处 《科学学与科学技术管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第5期44-54,共11页 Science of Science and Management of S.& T.
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71172193 71472061) 教育部高校博士点基金项目(20130161110032)
关键词 平台开放度 主导企业 绩效 平台吸引力 软件平台 platform openness dominant enterprise performance platform appearance software platform
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Peppard J, Rylander A. From value chain to value net- work: Insights for mobile operators[J]. European Ma- nagement Journal, 2006,24(2/3):128-141. 被引量:1
  • 2Koch S, Kerschbaum M. Joining a smartphone ecosys- tem: Application developers' motivations and decision criteria[J]. Information and Software Technology, 2014, 56(11):1423-1435. 被引量:1
  • 3陈钰芬,陈劲.开放度对企业技术创新绩效的影响[J].科学学研究,2008,26(2):419-426. 被引量:169
  • 4Pagani M, Fine C H. Value network dynamics in 3G-4G wireless communications: A systems thinking ap- proach to strategic value assessment[J]. Journal of Busi- ness Research, 2008,61(11):1102-1112. 被引量:1
  • 5Boudreau K J. Opening the platform vs. opening the complementary good? The effect on product innovation in handheld computing[DB/OL]. [2008-08-24]. http://pa- pers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.c fm?abstract_id= 1251167. 被引量:1
  • 6Stefi A, Berger M, Hess T. What influences platform provider's degree of openness? Measuring and analy- zing the degree of platform openness // Lassenius C, Smolander K. Software Business, Towards Continuous Value Delivery[M]. Berlin: Springer International Pub- lishing, 2014. 被引量:1
  • 7Parker G, Van Alstyne M. Innovation, openness & plat- form control[C]. Cambridge: Proceedings of the llth ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, 2010. 被引量:1
  • 8Boudreau K. Open platform strategies and innovation: Granting access vs. devolving control[J]. Management Science, 2010,56(10):1849-1872. 被引量:1
  • 9Laursen K, Salter A. Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms[J]. Strategic Management Jour- nal, 2006,27(2): 131-150. 被引量:1
  • 10Boudreau K, Lakhani K R. How to manage outside innovation[J]. MIT Sloan Management Review, 2009,50 (4):68-77. 被引量:1

二级参考文献100

  • 1陈菲琼,范良聪.基于合作与竞争的战略联盟稳定性分析[J].管理世界,2007,23(7):102-110. 被引量:86
  • 2Chesbrough H. Open Innovation, the New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology [ M ]. Harvard business school press, 2003. 被引量:1
  • 3Cohen W M, Levinthal D A. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation [ J ]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1990, 35 : 128 - 152. 被引量:1
  • 4Von Hippel E. The Sources of Innovation [ M ]. New York: Oxford University Press, 1988. 被引量:1
  • 5Nonaka I. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation [ J]. Organization Science, 1994, 5 : 14 - 37. 被引量:1
  • 6Caloghirou Y, Kastelli I, Tsakanikas A. Internal capabilities and external knowledge sources: complements or substitutes for innovative performance [ J]. Technovation, 2004, 24:29 - 39. 被引量:1
  • 7Mowery D C, Oxley J E, Silverman B S. Strategic alliance and interfirm knowledge transfer [ J ]. Strategic Management Journal, 1996, 17, 77 - 91. 被引量:1
  • 8Rigby D, Zook C. Open -Market Innovation[J]. Harvard Business Review, 2002, October, 80 - 89. 被引量:1
  • 9Kessler E H, Chakrabarti A K. Innovation speed: a conceptual model of context, antecedents, and outcomes [ J]. Academy of Management Review, 1996, 21, 1143 - 1191. 被引量:1
  • 10Pisano G. The R&D boundaries of the firm : an empirical analysis [ J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,1990, 35, 153 -176. 被引量:1

共引文献238

同被引文献99

引证文献9

二级引证文献59

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部