期刊文献+

三种不同麻醉方式对产妇血流动力学及新生儿的影响 被引量:4

Influence of Three Different Anesthetic Methods on Maternal Hemodynamics and Newborns in Cesarean Operation
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的;探讨硬膜外麻醉、蛛网膜下腔-硬膜外麻、气管插管全麻三种不同麻醉方式对剖宫产产妇血流动力学及胎儿的影响。方法:纳入行择期剖宫产产妇152例,采用随机表法将其分为硬膜外组(48例)、腰硬联合麻醉组(52例)、气管内插管全麻组(52例)。观察麻醉前正常状态时(T1)、麻醉成功后5 min(T2)、胎儿娩出时(T3)三个时间点产妇SBP、DBP、HR、SV、CO、SVR及胎儿相关指标,包括出生后1 min、5 min Apgar评分、脐动脉血pH、PCO_2、PO_2。结果:硬膜外麻、腰麻-硬膜外联合麻醉、全麻三组间麻醉起效时间有明显统计学差异(P<0.05),气管内插管全麻组起效时间最快。三组间在T1时间点SBP、DBP、HR、SV、CO、SVR差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。在T2时间点,硬膜外麻、联合麻醉、全麻三组SBP、DBP、HR、SVR水平均较T1时间点明显降低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。T2时间点,全麻组SBP、DBP、HR、SVR水平高于硬膜外、联合麻醉组(P<0.05)。T3时间点三组SBP、DBP、HR、SV、CO水平均较T2时间相比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。T3时间点,全麻组SBP、DBP、SVR高于其他两组,心率低于其他两组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。三组间新生儿出生后1 min Apagr、5 min Apgar评分、脐动脉血学pH、PCO_2无统计学差异(P>0.05)。三组间脐动脉血PO_2有明显统计学差异(P<0.05),气管内插管全麻组脐动脉血PO_2最高。结论:三种麻醉均可以用于剖宫产术,全麻剖宫产术对产妇血流动力学影响最小,起效快,但对胎儿脐动脉血氧浓度有一定的影响。 Objective: To explore the influence of three different anesthetic methods including epidural anesthesia, spinal-epidural anesthesia and endotracheal intubation anesthesia on the maternal hemodynamics and newborns in cesarean delivery. Methods: A total of 152 pregnant women were included in this research. They were randomly divided into epidural group (48 cases), spinal-epidural anesthesia group (52 eases) and endotracheal anesthesia group (52 cases). The matemal SBP, DBP, FIR, SV, CO and SVR were observed and recorded respectively at the normal state before anesthesia (T1), 5 rain after a successful anesthesia (T2) and fetal childbirth (T3), so were the fetal related indicators, including Apgar scores at 1 rain and 5 min after birth, pH, PCO2 and POE in umbilical artery blood. Results: The anesthesia narcotic effects between three groups have significantly statistical difference (P〈0.05). The endotraeheal anesthesia group started work firstly. At the T1 time point, there was no statistical difference in SBP, DBP, HR, SV, CO and SVR between the three groups (P〉0.05). The SBP, DBP, HR and SVR levels at T2 time point of the three groups were significantly lower than at T1 time point, and the differences were statistically significant (P〈0.05). At T2 time point, the BP, DBP, HR and SVR levels in general anesthesia group were higher than in epidural group and spinal-epidura! anesthesia group (P〈0.05). At T3 time point, the SBP, DBP, HR, SV and CO levels of the three groups had statistical difference as compared with those at T2 time point (P〈0.05). The SBP, DBP, SVR levels were higher in anesthesia group than in other two groups (P〈0.05), but the heart rate was lower in anesthesia group than in other two grolaps (P〈0.05). The 1 min Apagr scores, 5 min Apgar scores, umbilical artery blood pH and PCOz of the newborns had no statistical difference between three groups (P〉0.05). Umbilical arterial blood PO2 has significantly statistical differen
出处 《现代生物医学进展》 CAS 2016年第14期2679-2682,共4页 Progress in Modern Biomedicine
基金 湖北省教育厅科学技术研究项目(2012WJ34)
关键词 剖宫产术 硬膜外麻醉 血流动力学 Cesarean section Epidural anesthesia Hemodynamic
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Mahawar B, Baduni N, Bansal P. Cesarean section under local anesthesia: A step forward or backward? [J]. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol, 2014, 30(4): 578-579. 被引量:1
  • 2Ghobadifar M A, Zabetian H, Karami M Y, et al. Importance of matemal body temperature recording after injection of meperidine during spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing cesarean section: an offering for conducting clinical studies [J]. Rev Bras Anestesiol,2014, 64(6): 449. 被引量:1
  • 3Theerth K A, Sachidananda R, Shaikh S I. Epidural anesthesia for cesarean section in a primigravida woman with Ebstein's anomaly with recurrent supraventricular tachycardia [J]. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan, 2014, 52(4): 201-202. 被引量:1
  • 4Maitra S, Baidya D K, Bhattacharjee S. Near fatal bmdycardia during cesarean section under spinal anesthesia: "High spinal" may not be only risk factor[J]. Saudi J Anaesth, 2014, 8(Suppl 1 ): S 118-S 119. 被引量:1
  • 5Yalcin S, Aydogan H, Kucuk A, et al. Supplemental oxygen in elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia: Handle the sword with care [J]. Braz J Anesthesiol, 2013, 63(5): 393-397. 被引量:1
  • 6Schweiger V, Zanconato G, Lonati G, et al. Intracranial subdural hematoma after spinal anesthesia for cesarean section [J]. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol, 2013, 2013:253408. 被引量:1
  • 7Doebeli A, Michel E, Bettschart R, et al. Apgar score after induction of anesthesia for canine cesarean section with alfaxalone versus propofol [J]. Theriogenology, 2013, 80(8): 850-854. 被引量:1
  • 8Volquind D, Fellini R T, Rose G L, et al. Anesthesia for cesarean section in a patient with Guillain-Barre syndrome: ease report[J]. Braz J Anesthesiol, 2013, 63(4): 369-371. 被引量:1
  • 9Hadavi S M, AUahyary E, Asadi S. Evaluation of the adequacy of general anesthesia in cesarean section by bispeetral index [J]. Iran J Med Sci, 2013, 38(3): 240-247. 被引量:1
  • 10Yalcin S, Aydogan H, Yuce H H, et al. Effects of sevoflurane and desflurane on oxidative stress during general anesthesia for elective cesarean section[J]. Wien Klin Wochenschr, 2013, 125(15-16): 467- 473. 被引量:1

同被引文献32

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部