期刊文献+

“危急事态”和基本权利限制

Emergency Situation and Restriction of Fundamental Rights
下载PDF
导出
摘要 国家在处于危急情势或存亡威胁时,可以通过限制基本权利来消除危机。但是,为了防止国家滥用危急事态权能权能,进而侵害人民基本权利,各国设计了各项程序性机制来控制危急事态可能的失范。具言之,国家采取的各项危急措施必须遵循基本权利保护的最低标准,以确保在任何时候人的尊严和价值都能得以维系和实现。此外,国家危急事态措施还须遵循正当程序,接受基本权利本质内容不受侵害等原则、比例原则和法律明确性原则的检验。 Confronting great crises or other emergency situations, the state can restrict fundamental rights to elimi- nate the crises. However, in order to avoid the abuse of emergency powers and protect fundamental rights, the ex- ercise of emergency power must be restricted within the framework of law. Specifically, the exercise of emergency power must meet the minimum standard that value of human dignity at any time should be maintained and a- chieved. Moreover, the exercise of emergency power must follow the due procedure, the principle of protection of core of fundamental rights, the principle of proportionality and the principle of legal certainty.
作者 郑旭文
机构地区 福州大学法学院
出处 《湖南工业大学学报(社会科学版)》 2016年第1期50-56,共7页 Journal of Hunan University of Technology(Social Science Edition)
基金 福建省中青年教师教育科研项目"地震灾害中国家紧急法制运作模式的构建"(JA12050S)
关键词 危急事态 基本权利限制 最低标准 比例原则 emergency situation restriction of fundamental rights the minimum standard the principle of pro- portionality
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

  • 1GUPTA J D. A Season of Caesars : Emergency Regimes and Development Politics in Asia [ J ]. Asian Survey, 1978, Vol. 18:315. 被引量:1
  • 2GROSS Oren. Chaos and Rules: Should Responses to Vio- lent Crisis Always Be Constitutional? [J]. Yale Law Jour- nal,2003, Vol. 112. 被引量:1
  • 3HUSSAIN Nasser. The Jurisprudence of Emergency : Colo- nialism and the Rule of Law[ M]. Ann Arbor:University of Michigan Press ,2003 : 17. 被引量:1
  • 4AGAMBEN Giorgio. The State of Exeeption[ M]. translated by ATFELL Kevin. Chieago: University of Chieago Press, 2005:41. 被引量:1
  • 5SCHMITY Carl. Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Coneept of Sovereignty [ M ]. translated by SCHWAB George. Chicago : University of Chieago Pressed ,2005 : 11. 被引量:1
  • 6FRANKLIN D P. Extraordinary Measures:The Exercise of Prerogative Powers in the United States [ M ]. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1991:42. 被引量:1
  • 7LILLICH R B. The Paris Minimum Standards of Human Rights Norms in a State of Emergency[ J]. American Jour- nal of International Law, 1985, Vol. 79 : 1072. 被引量:1
  • 8黄俊杰著..法治国家之国家紧急权[M],2001:229.
  • 9Ex Parte Merryman, 17 Fed. Cas. 144 ( No. 9487) ( C. C. D. Md. 1861). [EB/OL]. [2015 - 05 - 15]. http:// www. britannica, com/event/Ex - Parte - Merryman. 被引量:1
  • 10Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer, 343 U. S. 579 (1952). [ EB/OL]. [ 2015 - 05 - 17 ]. https://su- preme, justia, com/cases/federal/us/343/579/case, ht- ml. 被引量:1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部