摘要
马克思和维特根斯坦作为"相距最远的两个哲学家"近几十年来正在以不同的方式相遇。以马尔库塞、吉登斯和温奇为代表的西方学者分别从正反两面将维特根斯坦语言哲学理论推进到政治哲学的论战中,进而构建了"马克思与维特根斯坦对立"的论调。作为理论延续和呼应,不同学者为马克思-维特根斯坦比较研究挖掘出三条可能性线索:第一,在实践、认识论和资本主义生活形式等问题上对马克思和维特根斯坦的理论进行相互阐释;第二,指认维特根斯坦哲学在政治上是保守主义的隐性同谋,因而与马克思主义相互排斥;第三,透过葛兰西的挚友斯拉法这一中介,马克思主义可能促成了维特根斯坦的哲学转向。其中也存在值得反思的问题:对维特根斯坦"遵守规则"问题的误读,以及对一个马克思与维特根斯坦共享的重要学术贡献的忽视,即:面对实证科学的侵蚀,捍卫社会科学的合法性。
The comparison of the philosophical theories of Marx and Wittgenstein is gradually built up to be heatedly-discussed topic inside the domain of political philosophy. Based on such context,it is the aim of the paper to construct a framework for investigating and making judgments on the brand new theoretical discourse in vogue, uncovering the backdrop and deductive logic by which the comparative studies function,as well as the deficiency of it. In other words,it is the compatibility of the theories of Marx and Wittgenstein that the paper be dedicated to canvass, after analyzing the comparative studies contributed by researchers supported by diversified theoretical backgrounds. The conclusion of the paper is that Marx and Wittgenstein shared a fundamental idea of defending the autonomy of social science from the attack of natural science,which is of great importance to contemporary philosophical studies,while loads of scholars ignored such a horizon.
出处
《世界哲学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第3期15-22,160,共8页
World Philosophy
