摘要
目的分析比较树脂、金属、陶瓷这3种不同的口腔修复材料的抗摩擦性能。方法选取我院2014年1月～2015年1月收治的需进行口腔修复的患者110例（牙齿135颗）。按照牙齿颗数分为A、B、C三组,各45颗。A组采用树脂材料修复,B组采用金属材料修复,C组采用陶瓷材料修复。6个月～1年后评价三组的牙齿修复效果。结果对三组患者的牙齿修复情况进行分析,6个月后,三组牙齿修复成功率分别为91.11%、93.33%和88.89%;12个月后,三组牙齿修复成功率下降为86.67%、82.22%和77.78%,差异有统计学意义（P〉0.05）。结论采用树脂、金属、陶瓷3种不同材料进行口腔修复的效果比较无明显差异,其抗摩擦性能的差距较小。因此可以根据患者的临床情况作出最佳选择。
Objective Analysis and comparison of the anti friction properties of 3 kinds of dental restorative materials, such as resin, metal and ceramic, are analyzed and compared.Methods Selected in January January 2014 in our hospital were treated with oral rehabilitation of patients with 110 cases（135 teeth）. According to the number of teeth is divided into A, B, C three groups, each of the 45. In the A group, the resin material was used to repair, and the B group was repaired by metal material, and the C group was repaired with ceramic material. 6 months ～1 years after the evaluation of three groups of teeth repair effect.Results Dental restoration of three groups of patients were analyzed after 6 months, three groups of dental restoration success rate of 91.11% and 93.33% and 88.89%, respectively; after 12 months, three groups of dental restoration success rate was 86.67% and 82.22% and 77.78%, the difference was statistically significant（P〉0.05） decreased. Conclusion There was no significant difference in the effect of dental restoration with resin, metal and ceramic 3 kinds of different materials. So we can make the best choice according to the patient＇s clinical condition.
出处
《全科口腔医学电子杂志》
2015年第12期6-7,共2页
Electronic Journal of General Stomatology
关键词
修复材料
口腔修复
抗摩擦性能
Repair material
Oral cavity repair
Anti friction property
