摘要
本文从荷兰画派的兴盛与再复兴之路,讨论其理论的高尚与平庸之争,即荷兰画派理论之影响性与世界意义。荷兰绘画的贡献不在于其宏大叙述,而在于其现实描述;不在于其附会风雅,而在于其平凡朴实;不在于其神灵崇拜和英雄仰慕的古典主义艺术之风,而在于其真实反映极简无华的生活场景,再现饱含人文主义情怀的现实主义之魂。本文拟从文献考证研究的拓展与突前,文化研究的整合与推进,诗画理论研究的反思与挑战,以及复兴研究的深化与诉求论述荷兰画派的流变与发展。
This paper attempts to explore the Dutch Golden Age painting＇ s lowness in contents and highness in theory from its path of prosperity and resurrection to illuminate its influence and signifi- cance in history. The Dutch Golden Age painting＇ s contributions lie not in its grand narration, liter- ary pursuits, or classical artistic style of adoring Gods and admiring heroes, but in its realistic depic- tion, plainness and simplicity, and soul of realism in representing the humanistic feelings. The pa- per demonstrates the diversification and innovation of recent developments from four aspects, namely the advancement and foregrounding of literary studies, the synthesizing and propelling effect of cul- tural studies, retrospection and challenges from narrative theories, as well as deepening and appeals of resurrection studies.
出处
《文化艺术研究》
2016年第1期144-154,共11页
Studies in Culture and Art
基金
浙江省人力资源和社会保障厅"钱江人才"计划(项目编号:QJC1402017)
浙江省社科联研究项目"乔治.爱略特小说中的视觉艺术研究"(项目编号:2015N124)的阶段性成果
关键词
荷兰画派
拉斯金
雅俗之争
兴盛之路
Dutch Golden Age painting
Ruskin
dispute of being refined or vulgar
path of resurrection
