期刊文献+

经椎旁肌入路结合伤椎固定治疗胸腰段椎体骨折 被引量:31

Treatment of thoracolumbar fractures with pedicle screw fixation at the fracture leve through paraspinal approach
原文传递
导出
摘要 [目的]探讨经肌间隙入路伤椎置钉联合短节段椎弓根钉复位固定治疗胸腰段椎体骨折的可行性及临床疗效。[方法]2009年2月~2014年5月经肌间隙入路伤椎置钉联合短节段椎弓根钉复位固定治疗无神经损伤表现的胸腰椎单节段骨折31例,男22例,女9例;年龄31~61岁,平均36.9岁;受伤至手术时间2 h^4 d,平均2d。依据Denis骨折分型:压缩型骨折18例,爆裂型骨折13例。骨折部位:T_(11)2例,T_(12)12例,L_113例,L_24例。应用视觉模拟评分法(visual analogue scale,VAS)及健康调查简表(the MOS item short-form health sutvey,SF-36)评估患者疼痛及生活质量改善的情况,通过影像学测量评估伤椎的高度丢失及脊柱后凸畸形的矫正情况。[结果]所有患者均获得随访,平均随访时间17.8个月(12~41个月)。内固定无松动、断裂。术前、术后3 d、术后1年时伤椎前缘高度比分别为(47.2±9.4)%、(96.7±9.3)%、(93.6±6.5)%;矢状面Cobb角分别为(39.31±2.56)°、(5.71±0.42)°、(5.81±0.71)°;差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。随访期间伤椎前缘高度及Cobb角无明显丢失,患者术前和术后1年随访时VAS评分分别为(9.76±0.24)分、(1.55±0.06)分,SF-36量表评分分别为(92.4±2.11)分、(118.01±2.01)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。影像学评估提示患者的脊柱伤椎高度丢失和后凸畸形得到较好的矫正。[结论]经椎旁肌间隙入路短节段结合伤椎固定,具有操作简单,置钉容易,手术时间短,出血少,同时复位良好,术后稳定可靠,是治疗胸腰段椎体骨折的有效方法。 [Objective]To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of pedicle screw fixation at the fracture leve in treating thoracolumbar fractures. [Method]From January 2009 to May 2014,31 patients with single level thoracolumbar fracture without neurological symptoms were treated with pedicle screw fixation at the fracture leve through paraspinal approach. There were 22 males and 9 females,aged from 31 to 61 years old with a mean of 36. 9 years. The duration from injury to operation ranged from 2 h to 4 d with an average of 2 d. According to the Denis fracture classification,compression fractures happedned in 18 cases and burst fractures happened in 13 cases. The fracture was located at T11 in 2 case,T12 in 12 cases,L1 in 13 cases and L2 in 4 cases. We evaluated the improvement of pain symptoms and life quality using The Visual Analogue Scale( VAS) and The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey( SF-36),and assessed the corrected status of vertebral height loss and kyphotic deformity by radiographic measurement. [Result]All patients were followed up for 12 to 41 months( mean 17. 8 months). No internal fixation failure was found. Anterior vertebral body height ratios at preoperative,3 days and 1 year after operation were 47. 2 ± 9. 4,96. 7 ± 9.3,93. 6 ± 6. 5,respectively. Sagittal Cobb angle at the three time points were( 39. 31 ± 2. 56) °,( 5. 71 ± 0. 42) °,( 5. 81 ± 0.71) °,respectively,all differences were statistically significant( P 〈 0. 05). The VAS score and the SF-36 score before operationboth improved at one year after operation follow- up,showing significant difference( [9. 76 ± 0. 24]-[1. 55 ± 0. 06],P 〈0. 05) and( [92. 4 ± 2. 11]-[118. 01 ± 2. 01]P 〈 0. 05). Imaging evaluation showed well correction of the lost height of the injured vertebrae and kyphotic deformity. [Conclusion]The paraspinal approach combined with short segment pedicle screws fixation at the fracture level is an good way for treating thoracolumbar fractures. This method has advantages of simple
出处 《中国矫形外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第8期697-701,共5页 Orthopedic Journal of China
关键词 胸椎 腰椎 椎弓根螺钉 内固定 thoracic vertebrae lumbar vertebrae pedicle screw internal fixation
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Min SH, Kim MH, Seo JB, et aL The quantitative analysis of back muscle degeneration after posterior lumbar fusion : comparison of min- imally invasive and conventional open surgery [ J ]. Asian Spine J, 2009,3(2) :89 -95. 被引量:1
  • 2Dubbelman Y, Groen J, Wildhagen M, et al. Quantification of changes in detrusor function and pressure - flow parameters after radical pros- tatectomy:relation to postoperative continence status and the impact of intensity of pelvic floor muscle exercises[ J]. Neurourol Urodyn, 2012,31 (5) :637 - 641. 被引量:1
  • 3王斌,曾忠友,韩建福,张建乔.椎旁肌间隙入路在腰椎骨折内固定术中的临床应用[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2013,21(18):1901-1903. 被引量:15
  • 4Boelderl A, Daniaux H, Kathrein A, et al. Danger of damaging the medial branches of the posterior rami of spinal nerves during a dorso- median approach to the spine[ J~. Clin Anat,2002,15 (2) :77 - 81. 被引量:1
  • 5Sihvonen T, Hemo A, Paljarvi L, et al. Local denervation atrophy of paraspinal muscles in postoperative failed back syndrome [ J 1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ,1993,18(5) :575 -581. 被引量:1
  • 6梁天龙,蒋礼源,郑小春,黄颂安.经椎旁肌间隙入路伤椎植骨内固定治疗胸腰椎爆裂性骨折[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2010,18(14):1212-1214. 被引量:16
  • 7Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Gejo R, et al. Preventive measures of backmuscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery in rats [ J ]. Spine ( Phila Pa 1976), 1998,23 (21) :2282 - 2288. 被引量:1
  • 8孔祥清,孟纯阳,张卫红,曹贵君,王叶新,陈筱.微创经皮穿刺椎弓根内固定术治疗胸腰椎骨折的临床疗效观察[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2015,23(8):692-695. 被引量:55
  • 9Ahay M, Ozkurt B, Aktekin CN, et al. Treatment of unstable thoraco- lumbar junction burst fractures with short - or long - segment poste- rior fixation in magerl type a fractures I J]. Eur Spine J,2007,16 (8) :1145 - 1155. 被引量:1
  • 10陈艺,白波,孙辉,吴景明,廖壮文,田联房,邓国勇,吴梅祥.短节段椎弓根钉固定术的生物力学研究[J].中华创伤杂志,2010,26(1):39-43. 被引量:49

二级参考文献34

  • 1李康华,张琥,张宏其,胡建中,雷光华,胡懿郃,王锡阳.Moss Miami内固定及椎管减压治疗胸腰椎骨折的探讨[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2005,13(2):98-100. 被引量:28
  • 2黄其杉,彭茂秀,林焱,毛方敏,倪文飞,王向阳,池永龙,徐华梓.经皮椎弓根螺钉固定治疗胸腰椎骨折[J].中华骨科杂志,2005,25(12):758-760. 被引量:49
  • 3魏富鑫,刘少喻,赵卫东,于滨生,李浩淼,陈柏龄,梁春祥.胸腰椎爆裂性骨折伤椎固定的生物力学研究[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2006,8(9):857-860. 被引量:44
  • 4李勤,田伟,刘波,胡临,李志宇,袁强.导航辅助微创经皮穿刺椎弓根内固定术治疗胸腰椎骨折的疗效观察[J].中华医学杂志,2007,87(19):1339-1341. 被引量:16
  • 5Alvine GF, Swain JM, Asher MA, et al. Treatment of thoraeolnmbar burst fractures with variale screw placement or lsola instrumentation and arthrodesis: case series and literature review. J Spinal Disord tech, 2004, 17(4) : 251 -264. 被引量:1
  • 6Parker JW, Lane JR, Karaikovic EE, et al. Successful short - segment instrumentation and fusion far thoracolumhar spine fractures: a consecutive 41/2 - year series. Spine, 2000, 25 (9) : 1157 1170. 被引量:1
  • 7Alanay A, Acaroglu E, Yazici M, et al. Short - segment pedicle instrumentation of thoracolumbar burst fractures: does transpedicular intracorporeal grafting prevent early failures. Spine, 2001, 26 (2) :213 -217. 被引量:1
  • 8Chiba M, Mclain RF, Yerby SA, et al. Short - segment pedicle instrumentation: biomechanical analysis of supplemental hook fixation. Spine, 1996, 21 (3) :288 - 294. 被引量:1
  • 9Mahar A, Kim C, Wedemeyer M, et al. Short - segment fixation of lumbar burst fractures using pedicle fixation at the level of the fracture. Spine, 2007, 32 (14) : 1503 - 1507. 被引量:1
  • 10Dick JC, Jones MP, Zdeblick TA, et al. A biomechanical comparison evaluating the use of intermediate screws and cross - linkage in lumbar pedicle fixation. J Spinal Disord, 1994, 7 (5) :402 - 407. 被引量:1

共引文献172

同被引文献229

引证文献31

二级引证文献169

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部