期刊文献+

Focuson Form和Focuson Forms两种教学法对汉语二语词汇学习的影响 被引量:15

The Role of Form-focused Instruction in CSL Vocabulary Learning:A Comparative Study of “Focus on Form” versus “Focus on Forms”
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文通过一项教学实验考察两种不同的形式教学法,即:意义优先、聚焦形式教学法(Focus on Form,简称FonF)和全形式教学法(Focus on Forms,简称FonFs)对汉语二语词汇学习的影响。意义优先、聚焦形式教学法在完成阅读理解任务的过程中学习生词,而全形式教学法则采用传统的词汇表方式学习生词。实验从五个维度测量了两种教学法对汉语二语词汇学习的影响,结果发现:整体而言,全形式教学法对汉语二语学习者的词汇学习效果更显著;尤其是在词汇搭配、词义联想方面,全形式教学法显著优于意义优先、聚焦形式教学法。 This paper presents an empirical study on the effects of two types of formfocused instruction—focus on form(FonF)and focus on forms(FonFs)— on CSL vocabulary learning.The FonF approach attends to target words within a reading comprehension task,while FonFs teaches and practices target words by means of a word list and two vocabulary exercises.Five aspects of vocabulary knowledge were measured in order to compare the effectiveness of both types of instruction.The results indicate that in general,the FonFs approach is more effective than FonF for L2 learning of Chinese vocabulary.To be more specific,FonFs gives learners advantages in vocabulary collocation and association.
作者 洪炜 王丽婧
出处 《世界汉语教学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第2期264-275,共12页 Chinese Teaching in the World
基金 国家社科基金重大项目"汉语二语学习的认知过程与高效率教学模式研究"(项目编号:12&ZD224)的资助
关键词 意义优先 聚焦形式教学法全形式教学法二语词汇学习词汇知识 focus on form focus on forms L2 vocabulary learning vocabulary knowledge
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

二级参考文献86

共引文献40

同被引文献392

引证文献15

二级引证文献72

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部