期刊文献+

国家能力与体制转轨——兼论新古典主义理论缺陷与中国改革的若干经验 被引量:8

The State Capacity and Economic Transition——With Some Comments on the Flaws of Neo-classical Transition Theory and the Positive Experiences of Chinese Reform
原文传递
导出
摘要 如何看待政府在社会经济活动中的作用,既是经济学家长期纷争不已的问题,更是近年来转轨经济研究涉猎的重大挑战性课题。不同转轨国家的实践证明了国家能力有效性对于制度变迁的至关重要意义,彰显了强调政府职能的反新古典传统的转轨理论的科学价值,昭示了流行的新古典学派转轨理论的严重缺陷,宣告了自由放任主义的失败。结合当代转轨国家丰富的实践经验,从理论上系统地阐述国家能力与体制转轨的关系,进一步剖析新古典主义自由放任理念的错误实质,深入地总结以保持国家有效能力为显著特征的中国改革实践所具有的理论内涵,将有助于促进当代转轨理论研究乃至整个经济学理论的重大发展与创新。 It was always a disputed subject in economics, and even the more challenging issue in the new branch of transition economics that how to look upon the role of government in social economic process. The experiences of various transition countries have showed that the effective state capacity is the pivot for institutional change, hence the anti-Neo-classical transition theories which emphasize the government functions in the institutional change is much superior to the Neo-classical, the named "main stream" transition doctrine which always believe in lasses-faire, and finally, have certified the failure of lasses-faire. So, to provide a profound elucidation state capacity and institutional transition, and to on some relevant issues about the relation between the carry forward the analysis of the essence of the error of Neo-classical lasses-faire idea based on the practices of contemporary transition countries, and to give the positive experiences of Chinese reform characterized by strongly effective state capacity some theoretical generation, will certainly be important for advance and innovation of contemporary transition research and even the whole economics.
作者 张凤林
出处 《学术月刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第4期40-53,共14页 Academic Monthly
基金 国家社科基金重点项目"当代西方不同学派的体制转轨理论比较研究"(14AJL004)的阶段性成果
关键词 国家能力 体制转轨 转轨经济学 国家干预 自由放任 state capacity, institutional transition, transition economics, state intervene, lasses-faire
  • 相关文献

参考文献62

  • 1World Bank, Worm Development Report(1997): The State in Changing World, New York: Oxford University Press, 1997, p.3, p.20. 被引量:1
  • 2M. Myant, J. Drahokoupil, Transition Economies: Political Economy in Russia, Eastern Europe, and Central Asia, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2011, pp. 123 - 124. 被引量:1
  • 3N.H. Barma, E. Huybens, and L. Vifiuela, ed. Institutions Taking Root: Building State Capacity in Challenging Contexts, Washington, D.C.: The World Bank, 2014, pp.3-4. 被引量:1
  • 4World Bank, World Development Report(2002): Building Institutions for Markets, New York: Oxford University Press, 2002, p.99. 被引量:1
  • 5塞缪尔·P.亨廷顿.《变动社会中的政治秩序》,王冠华、刘为等译,上海:上海人民出版社,2008年,第31-43页. 被引量:1
  • 6M. Myant and J. Drahokoupil, Transition Economies: Political Economy in Russia, Eastern Europe, and Central Asia, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2011, pp.36-38. 被引量:1
  • 7World Bank, Worm Development Report(1997): The State in Changing World, New York: Oxford University Press, 1997, p.85. 被引量:1
  • 8G. Turley and P. Luke, Transition Economics: Two Decades on, London and New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2011, pp.376-377. 被引量:1
  • 9E. Berglof and G. Roland, ed. The Economics of Transition: The Fifth Nobel Symposium in Economics, New York: Palgrave, Macmillan, 2007, p.3. 被引量:1
  • 10G. Roland, ed. Economies in Transition: The Long-Run View, New York: Palgrave, Macmillan, 2012, p.2. 被引量:1

共引文献13

同被引文献77

引证文献8

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部