期刊文献+

俯卧位与截石斜仰卧位在经皮肾镜碎石术中的应用对比 被引量:2

Comparison between prone position and lithotomic oblique supine position applied in percutaneous nephrolithotomy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较俯卧位与截石斜仰卧位在经皮肾镜碎石术中应用的疗效及安全性。方法:将80例经皮肾镜碎石手术患者随机分为俯卧位与截石斜仰卧位2组,每组40例。对不同体位下建立通道时间、手术时间、一次清石率、术中出血量、术后发热及脏器误伤等方面进行比较。结果:两种体位均能顺利完成手术,截石斜仰卧位手术时间、一次清石率及术中出血量等指标优于俯卧位,但两组间无统计学差异。结论:截石斜仰卧位经皮肾镜取石术治疗上尿路结石具有安全、高效、微创的特点,患者体位舒适,便于术中麻醉监测,术中碎石易排出,值得临床推广应用。 Objective: To compare the application of prone position and lithotomy oblique supine position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Methods: 80 patients with renal calculi were randomly divided into two groups with 40 cases each. One group applied the prone position and the other applied lithotomic oblique supine position. The time of establishing the percutaneous channel, operation time, stone clearance rate, blood loss, postoperative fever, and viscera injury in the two groups were evaluated retrospectively. Results: Surgeries in the two groups were all successfully completed. Operation time, stone clearance rate, and blood loss in the lithotomic oblique supine position group were better than that of the prone position group. Conclusion: The application of the lithotomic oblique supine position in PCNL has various advantages and it is worthy of clinical promotion.
作者 张建华 罗浩
出处 《中外女性健康研究》 2016年第3期4-5,共2页 Women's Health Research
关键词 肾结石 经皮肾镜碎石术 俯卧位 截石斜仰卧位 Renal calculi Prone position Lithotomic oblique supine position
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献17

  • 1Cracco CM, Scoffone CM, Scarpa RM. New developments in percutaneous techniques for simple and complex branched renal stones. Curr Opin Urol, 2011, 21(2): 154-160. 被引量:1
  • 2Preminger GM. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an extreme technical makeover for an old technique. Arch Ital Urol Androl, 2010, 82(1): 23-25. 被引量:1
  • 3Falahatkar S, Allahkhah A, Soltanipour S. Supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy: pro. J Urol, 2011, 8(4): 257-264. 被引量:1
  • 4Valdivia Uria JG, Valle Gerhold J, Ltpez Ltpez JA, et al. Technique and complications of percutaneous nephroscopy: experience with 557 patients in the supine position. J Urol, 1998, 160 (6 Pt 1): 1975-1978. 被引量:1
  • 5Xu KW, Huang J, Guo ZH, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in semisupine position: a modified approach for renal calculus. Urol Res, 2011, 39(6): 467-475. 被引量:1
  • 6Miano R, Scoffone C, De Nunzio C, et al. Position: prone or supine is the issue of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endouvo], 2010, 24(6): 931-938. 被引量:1
  • 7Gofrit ON, Shapiro A, Donchin Y, et al. Lateral decubitus position for percutaneous nephrolithotripsy in the morbidly obese or kyphotie patient. J Endourol, 2002, 16(6): 383-386. 被引量:1
  • 8Liu L, Zheng S, Xu Y, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of percutaneous nephrolithotomy for patients in the supine versus prone position. J Endourol, 2010, 24(12): 1941-1946. 被引量:1
  • 9Craeco CM, Scoffone CM. ECIRS (Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery) in the Galdakao-medified supine Valdivia position: a new life for percutaneous surgery? World J Urol, 2011, 29(6): 821-827. 被引量:1
  • 10Ray AA, Chung DG, Honey RJ. Percutaneous nephrolithotomyin the prone and prone-flexed positions: anatomic considerations [J]. J Endourol,2009,23(10) : 1607-1614. 被引量:1

共引文献43

同被引文献17

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部