摘要
目的探究产妇急性大出血的临床治疗方法以及原因。方法随机选取该院在2013年2月—2014年12月期间接收的130例妇产科急性大出血患者,按照手术方法的不同将这些患者分为观察组和对照组,观察组所有患者采用介入性动脉栓塞治疗,对照组患者采用常规的治疗方法,对两组患者的治疗效果进行比较分析。结果在术中平均出血量、阴道出血时间、平均手术时间、完全出血现象消失时间以及患者术后并发症方面,观察组显著优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对于妇产科急性大出血患者在临床治疗过程中采用介入性动脉栓塞治疗方法,有着较多的优点,而且治疗效果显著,值得临床推广使用。
Objective To discuss the clinical treatment methods and causes of acute massive hemorrhage in obstetrics and gynecology. Methods 130 cases of patients with acute massive hemorrhage in obstetrics and gynecology treated in our hospital from February 2013 to December 2014 were randomly selected and divided into observation group and control group according to different operation methods, the observation group were given interventional arterial embolization treatment,the control group were given conventional treatment method, and the treatment effects of the two groups were compared and analyzed. Results The intraoperative average bleeding volume, vaginal bleeding time, average operation time, complete bleeding disappearance time and postoperative complications in patients in the observation group were obviously better than those in the control group（P〈0.05）, and the difference was statistically significant. Conclusion Interventional arterial embolization method in the treatment of patients with acute massive hemorrhage in obstetrics and gynecology has a lot of advantages and an obvious treatment effect, which is worthy of promotion and application in clinic.
出处
《中外医疗》
2016年第1期67-68,共2页
China & Foreign Medical Treatment
关键词
妇产科急性大出血
接入性动脉栓塞
治疗分析
Acute massive hemorrhage in obstetrics and Gynecology
Interventional arterial embolization
Treatment analysis
