摘要
目的对比Ethibond线与钛缆用于PMLC的近期疗效。方法 2014年6~12月,65例CSM患者随机分Ethibond线组和钛缆组行PMLC,比较术前、术后3、12个月的颈部疼痛VAS评分、脊髓功能JOA评分、术前、术后颈椎活动度、过屈/过伸位曲度,CT观察棘突-椎板愈合情况。结果 Ethibond线组术后3个月、12个月颈部过屈/过伸位曲度、活动度及VAS疼痛评分优于钛缆组（P=0.02,0.01,0.03,0.00）;棘突-椎板愈合率两组无明显差异。结论 Ethibond线和钛缆用于PMLC,在脊髓功能恢复、保留颈椎运动功能、棘突-椎板愈合率无明显差异。
Objective To compare the short-term efficacies of Ethibond line and titanium cable in the treatment of PMLC. Methods 65 patients received PMLC from June to December 2014, The 3 months and 12 months post JOA, VAS, NDI, and the range of motions were compared. Results The 3 months 12 months post operative maximum cervical flexion/ extension,VAS of the Ethibond line group were superior to those in the titanium cable group（P=0.02, 0.01, 0.03, and 0.00）. Conclusion Ethibond line and titanium cable were used in the treatment of PMLC, their effects were not obvious difference.
出处
《中国继续医学教育》
2016年第7期128-129,共2页
China Continuing Medical Education
