期刊文献+

限度与界线:三重维度下的文本阐释研究

Limits of Textual Interpretation:From the Cognitive,Semantic and Pragmatic Perspectives
原文传递
导出
摘要 在西方后现代哲学和神秘主义思潮的影响下,文本阐释呈现多元、虚无的"过度阐释"倾向。但文本阐释并非没有界限,分别在认知、语义和语用三重维度上体现出意义的边界。在认知维度上,虽然语言具有创造性,但人们会集体式、不自觉基于语言经济原则进行阐释,因此至少在一些关键信息上存在认知趋同。在语义维度上,理念意义允许无限的个别意义,但仍然规定了这些个别阐释的界限,界限之外的阐释为过度阐释。在语用维度上,可能的阐释是无数的,但人们接受的阐释却是一个或数个,阐释的有效性必须接受语言交往共同体的检验。在上述维度观照下,文本阐释空间体现了界限下的创造与约束。 Under the influence of post-modern Western philosophy and mysticism there is a tendency of over-interpretation in textual interpretation. Where there are communication,agreement and knowledge,limits exist in textual interpretation and cognitive,semantic and pragmatic boundaries arise. Cognitively,people have commonalities on major information due to their language cognition on the principle of economy. Semantically,the textual ideational meaning puts limit on the textual interpretation although within the limit there are numerous possible interpretations. Over-interpretation appears beyond the limits of ideational meaning. Pragmatically,speech community will allow only one or several interpretations instead of numerous possible ones. These several interpretations accepted by the community are what we call valid interpretations. All in all,textual interpretation is constrained as well as creative.
作者 董丽云
出处 《科学技术哲学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第2期29-34,共6页 Studies in Philosophy of Science and Technology
基金 2014年度教育部人文社会科学基金青年项目(14YJC840008) 福建省2012年度高校科研杰出青年支持项目(JA12187S)
关键词 界限 文本阐释 理念意义 过度阐释 limits textual interpretation ideational meaning over-interpretation
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1董丽云.当代西方文本阐释理论研究的现状与限度[J].国外社会科学,2014(1):116-125. 被引量:1
  • 2伽达默尔著 洪汉鼎译.真理与方法[M].上海:上海译文出版社,1999.. 被引量:247
  • 3艾柯等.诠释与过度诠释[M].王宇根译.北京:三联书店,1997. 被引量:9
  • 4南帆..文学理论[M],2002.
  • 5陈晓明著..解构的踪迹:历史、话语与主体[M].北京:中国社会,1994:261.
  • 6RORTY R. Contingency, irony, and solidarity [ M ]. Cam- bridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989 : 75. 被引量:1
  • 7CHOMSKY N. Knowledge of language: its nature, origins, and use [ M ]. Santa Barbara: Greenwood Press, 1985 : 169. 被引量:1
  • 8南帆著..理论的紧张[M].上海:上海三联书店,2003:290.
  • 9MARTINET A. A functional view of language [ M ]. Oxford : Clarendon Press, 1962:24. 被引量:1
  • 10MIALL D S. The indeterminacy of literary texts : the view fromthe reader[ J]. Journal of literary semantics, 1988, (17) :155 -171. 被引量:1

共引文献399

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部