期刊文献+

腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术与腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术治疗复发性腹股沟疝的疗效及安全性研究 被引量:6

Effi cacy and safety of totally extraperitoneal and transabdominal preperitoneal laparoscopic techniques for recurrent inguinal hernia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究治疗复发性腹股沟疝中腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术(TEP)与腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术(TAPP)的疗效及安全性。方法分析2014年3月‐2015年3月该院接受治疗的88例复发性腹股沟疝患者的资料,将其按照手术治疗的不同方式分为两组:TEP组和TAPP组,观察两组患者的治疗效果及复发情况。结果 TEP组患者的手术时间、下床活动时间、术后肛门排气时间及术后24 h疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分状况明显优于TAPP组;术中出血量明显多于TAPP组(P<0.05);术后的并发症尿潴留、血清肿、中转开腹、不完全性肠梗阻、术后复发情况相比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论采用TEP治疗复发性腹股沟疝术后患者恢复较采用TAPP的快些,且两组手术治疗下患者的症状能够得到较好的改善,安全性较高,较好地降低复发率。 【Objective】To study the efficacy and safety of totally extraperitoneal(TEP) repair and transabdominal preperitoneal(TAPP) repair in treating recurrent inguinal hernia.【Methods】Patient data of 88 cases with recurrent inguinal hernia accepted to our hospital from March 2014 to March 2015 were analysed, and were divided into two groups according to different surgical treatment: TEP group and TAPP group. The treatment effect and relapse in the two groups were observed.【Results】The operative time, ambulation time and postoperative anal exhaust time in TEP group were signifi cantly shorter than those in TAPP group, postoperative Visual Analogue Scale(VAS) pain score at 24 h in TEP group was signifi cantly better than that in TAPP group, and intraoperative blood loss in TEP group was signifi cantly higher than that in TAPP group(P〈0.05); there were no signifi cant differences in post-operative complications such as urine retention, seroma, conversion to laparotomy, incomplete intestinal obstruction, and postoperative recurrence(P〉0.05).【Conclusion】Patients with recurrent inguinal hernia have a faster recovery when treated with TEP approach than those treated with TAPP approach. Both the two surgical management can improve patient symptoms effectively, reduce the relapse rate effectively and have high security.
出处 《中国医学工程》 2016年第2期16-18,共3页 China Medical Engineering
关键词 复发性腹股沟疝 TEP TAPP 疗效及安全性 recurrent inguinal hernia TEP TAPP effi cacy and safety
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献45

  • 1谭友春,卢榜裕,蔡小勇,陆文奇,黄玉斌,黄飞,龚加明.两种无张力疝修补术在治疗成人腹股沟斜疝中的对比[J].中国内镜杂志,2005,11(8):828-831. 被引量:18
  • 2蔡小勇,卢榜裕,陆文奇,黄飞,黄玉斌,江文枢,刘祖军,秦诚.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补手术方式选择与手术经验[J].微创医学,2007,2(3):172-174. 被引量:8
  • 3段鑫,王勇,何涛,李明杰,郑英健.局麻无张力疝修补术与腹腔镜全腹膜外疝修补术的临床对比分析[J].中国普通外科杂志,2007,16(7):678-680. 被引量:21
  • 4Ferzli GS,Shapiro K,De Turris SV,et al.Totally extraperitoneal(TEP)hernia repair after an original TEP.Is it safe,and is it even possible?[J].Surg Endosc,2004,18(3):526-528. 被引量:1
  • 5Feliu X,Torres G,Vinas X,et al.Preperitoneal repair for recurrent inguinal hernia:laparoscopic and open approach[J].Hernia,2004,8(2):113-116. 被引量:1
  • 6Dedemadi G,Sgourakis G,Karaliotas C,et al.Comparison of laparoscopic and open tension-free repair of recurrent inguinal hernias:a prospective randomized study[J].Surg Endosc,2006,20(7):1 099-1 104. 被引量:1
  • 7Bingener J,Dorman JP,Valdes G,et al.Recurrence rate after laparoscopic repair of recurrent inguinal hernias:have we improved?[J].Surg Endosc,2003,17(11):1 781-1 783. 被引量:1
  • 8Pokorny H,Klingler A,Schmid T,et al.Recurrence and complications after laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair:results of a prospective randomized multicenter trial[J].Hernia,2008,12(4):385-389. 被引量:1
  • 9Eklund A,Rudberg C,Leijonmarck CE,et al.Recurrent inguinal hernia:randomized multicenter trial comparing laparoscopic and Lichtenstein repair[J].Surg Endosc,2007,21(4):634-640. 被引量:1
  • 10Simons MP,Aufenacker T,Bay-Nielsen M,et al.European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients[J].Hernia,2009,13(4):343-403. 被引量:1

共引文献79

同被引文献46

引证文献6

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部