期刊文献+

上尿路结石标准通道经皮肾镜碎石术部分无管化的临床探讨 被引量:8

Clinical investigation of partial tubeless standard tract PCNL in treatment of upper urinary tract calculi
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨部分无管化标准通道经皮肾镜碎石术(PCNL)在治疗上尿路结石方面的可行性及安全性.方法 2013年8月至2015年3月,共有50例符合标准的患者纳入临床随机对照试验研究.患者被随机分成部分无管化PCNL组和标准PCNL组,两组间在年龄、性别及结石面积无显著性差异.观察手术时间、血液丢失量、术后疼痛指数、住院时间及并发症数等相关指标.结果 所有患者均手术成功,部分无管化PCNL与标准PCNL比可减轻术后患者疼痛评分[(3.61±1.52)、(5.85±1.73)分,P<0.05],缩短患者住院时间[(5.24±1.26)、(6.96±2.03)d,P<0.05].两组在手术时间、出血量及并发症数方面无显著性差异.结论 部分无管化PCNL治疗特定上尿路结石患者是安全可行的. Objectives To investigate the feasibility and safety of partial tubeless standard tract percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).Methods Fifty patients who meet the standards were enrolled in a prospective randomized controlled trial form August 2013 to March 2015.These patients were randomly divided into two groups:partial tubeless PCNL and standard PCNL.There was no significant difference in age,sex and stone area between two groups.Factors evaluated included operative time,postoperative pain,blood loss,postoperative hospital stay,and postoperative complications.Results All the 50 patients were treated successfully.Compared with standard PCNL,partial tubeless had additional advantages in postoperative pain [(3.61 ± 1.52) vs.(5.85 ± 1.73),P 〈 0.05] and hospital stay [(5.24 ± 1.26) vs.(6.96 ± 2.03),P 〈 0.05];while there were no differences in operative time,blood loss and postoperative complications.Conclusions Partial tubeless PCNL can be considered as safe and feasible treating selective patients with upper urinary calculi.
出处 《国际泌尿系统杂志》 2016年第2期181-184,共4页 International Journal of Urology and Nephrology
关键词 尿路结石 肾造口术 经皮 碎石术 Urinary Calculi Nephrostomy, Percutaneous Lithotripsy
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献38

  • 1曾国华,李逊,何朝辉,单炽昌,袁坚,陈文忠,王露萍,吴开俊.微创经皮肾取石术和传统经皮肾镜取石术对肾皮质损伤的比较[J].中华实验外科杂志,2004,21(12):1551-1552. 被引量:118
  • 2钱庆鹏,张晓春,那彦群.经皮肾镜取石术的并发症与对策[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2007,22(7):491-493. 被引量:130
  • 3Türk Ch,Knoll T,Petrik A,et al.Guidlines on urolithiasis,EAU pocket guidelines[M].Arnhem,Netherland:Drukkerij Gelderland bv,2010:260-266. 被引量:1
  • 4Basiri A,Ziaee AM,Kianian HR,et al.Uhrasonographic versus fluoroscopic access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy:a randomized clinical trial[J].J Endourol,2008,22(2):281-284. 被引量:1
  • 5Matlaga BR,Shah OD,Zagoria RJ,et al.Computerized tomography guided access for percutaneous nephrostolithotomy[J].J Urol,2003,170:45-47. 被引量:1
  • 6Lahme S,Bichler KH,Strohmaier WL,et al.Minimally invasive PCNL in patients with renal pelvic and calyceal stones[J].Eur Urol,2001,40(6):691-624. 被引量:1
  • 7Vorrakitpokatorn P,Permtongchuchai K,Raksamani EO,et al.Perioperative complications and risk factors of percutaneous nephrolithotomy[J].J Med Assoc Thai,2006,89:826-833. 被引量:1
  • 8Safak M,Gogus C,Soygur T.Nephrostomy tract dilation using a balloon dilator in percutaneous renal surgery:experience with 95 cases and comparison with the fascial dilator system[J].Urol Int,2003,71(4):382-384. 被引量:1
  • 9Gremmo E.Hemorrhagic complications during percutaneous nephrolithotomy.Retrospective studies of 772 cases.Prog Urol,1999,9:460-463. 被引量:1
  • 10Turna B,Nazli O,Demiryoguran S,et al.Percutaneous nephrolithotomy:Variables that influence hemorrhage.Urology,2007,69(4):603-607. 被引量:1

共引文献247

同被引文献56

引证文献8

二级引证文献59

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部