期刊文献+

语法测试中的方法效应与语法水平的交互作用——基于高低水平组语法表现的比较

Test Method Effect on Grammatical Performance of Test-takers at Lower and Higher Proficiency Levels
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文结合定量和定性分析,通过比较高低水平组在语法填空题和语法选择题的得分、各题项答案和解题过程的不同,探究语法测试中的方法效应与语法水平的交互作用。结果表明,高低水平组在两种测试方法的成绩均有显著差异,高低水平组分别有34.6%和54.9%的答案前后发生变化,两种测试方法解题过程使用的语法知识和策略均存在差异。说明测试方法与水平之间存在交互作用,不同的测试方法对高低水平组造成不同程度的影响。 The present paper investigates test method effect on grammatical performance of test- takers at lower and higher proficiency levels by directly comparing their test scores,individual responses and test- taking processes in the gap- filling cloze grammar test and the multiple- choice cloze grammar test. The results show that for both lower and higher groups,their scores in two test formats are significantly different,their responses have changed in about 54. 9% and 34. 6% of the overall items answered respectively and their test- taking processes in terms of grammatical knowledge and strategy use also differ between two test formats. It can be concluded that different test methods affect grammatical performance of test- takers at lower and higher proficiency levels to varying degrees.
作者 张惠玲
出处 《考试研究》 2016年第2期82-88,共7页 Examinations Research
关键词 测试方法效应 语法水平 语法填空题 语法选择题 语法表现 Test Method Effect Grammatical Proficiency Gap-Filling Cloze Grammar Test Multiple-Choice Cloze Grammar Test Grammatical Performance
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1曾用强著..英语语言测试基础[M].广州:华南理工大学出版社,2009:221.
  • 2Kobayashi, M. Method Effects on Reading Comprehension Test Performance: Text Organization and Response Format [ J ]. Language Testing,2002,19 (2) : 193 - 220. 被引量:1
  • 3王永庆,曾用强.测试方法效应对听力理解成绩的影响作用——NMET和NMET2听力理解测试的对比分析[J].现代外语,2006,29(1):62-70. 被引量:22
  • 4Wagner,E. The Effect of the Use of Video Texts on ESL Listening Test- taker Performance [J]. Language Testing,2010b,27 (4) : 493 -513. 被引量:1
  • 5David, G. Investigating the Performance of Alternative Types of Grammar Items [ J ]. Language Testing,2007,24 ( 1 ) : 65 - 97. 被引量:1
  • 6Rashidi,N. & Safari,F. Does the Type of Muhiple- choice Item Make a Difference? The Case of Testing Grammar [ J]. Iranian Journal of Language Testing,2014,4 (2) : 175 - 186. 被引量:1
  • 7Tsagari, C. Method Effect on Testing Reading Comprehension: How Far Can We Go? [ D ]. University of Lancaster: Department of Linguistics and Modem English language, 1994. 被引量:1
  • 8Currie M. & Chiramanee T. The Effect of the Multiple- choice Item Format on the Measurement of Knowledge of Language Structure [ J]. Language Testing,2010, 27 (4) : 471 - 491. 被引量:1
  • 9Shohamy, E. Does the Testing Qethod Make a Difference.'? The Case of Reading Comprehension. Language Testing, 1984,1 (2) ; 147 - 170. 被引量:1
  • 10刘建达.测试方法对阅读测试的影响[J].外语教学与研究,1998,30(2):50-54. 被引量:40

二级参考文献39

  • 1Bachman, L. F. 1990. Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing[M]. Oxford University Press. 被引量:1
  • 2Bae, J. & L. F. Bachman. 1998. A latent variable approach to listening and reading: Testing factorial invariance across two groups of children in the Korean/English Two-Way Immersion Program [J]. Language Testing 15: 380-414. 被引量:1
  • 3Bennett, R. E. & W. C. Ward. 1993. Construction versus Choice in Cognitive Measurement: Issues in Constructed Response, Performance Testing, and Portfolio Assessment [M]. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlaum Associates. 被引量:1
  • 4Bentler, P. M. 1990. Comparative fit indexes in structural models [J]. Psychological Bulletin 107 : 238-46. 被引量:1
  • 5Bentler, P. M. & D. G. Bonett. 1980. Significance tests and goodness-of-fit in the analysis of covariance structures [ J ]. Psychological Bulletin 88 : 588-606. 被引量:1
  • 6Bollen, K, A, 1989, Structural Equations with Latent Variables [M]. New York: John Wiley. 被引量:1
  • 7Brindley G. & H. Slatyer. 2002. Exploring task difficulty in ESL listening assessment [J]. Language Testing 19: 369-394. 被引量:1
  • 8Buck, G. & K. Tatsuoka. 1998. Application of the rule-space procedure to language testing: examining attributes of a free response listening test [J]. Language Testing 15: 119-57. 被引量:1
  • 9Buck, G. 1992. Listening comprehension: construct validity and trait characteristics [J]. Language Learning 42: 313-57. 被引量:1
  • 10Buck, G. 2001. Assessing Listening [M]. Cambridage University Press. 被引量:1

共引文献58

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部