期刊文献+

锥形束CT数字成像分析牙槽嵴裂植骨修复的成骨效果 被引量:6

Osteogenesis of alveolar bone graft: evaluation by cone beam CT
下载PDF
导出
摘要 背景:牙槽嵴裂患者植骨后骨存量目前多使用二维影像进行分析测量,结论误差较大。目的:探讨锥形束CT评价牙槽嵴裂植骨后6个月成骨效果的应用。方法:随机抽取25例单侧完全性牙槽嵴裂的患者,进行牙槽嵴裂髂骨移植,6个月后采用锥形束CT进行观察。结果与结论:牙槽嵴裂骨移植后,唇侧牙槽骨保存量较腭侧高;另外中切牙裂隙侧与正常侧的牙槽骨厚度差异有显著性意义,而尖牙缺隙侧与正常侧牙槽骨厚度在距离牙槽嵴顶0 mm处的牙槽骨厚度处差异有显著性意义,其余部位差异无显著性意义。说明牙槽嵴裂骨移植时腭侧支持骨少于唇侧,缺隙侧中切牙的支持骨也不理想,从而为牙槽骨移植和正畸治疗牙齿移动提供依据。 BACKGROUND: In alveolar cleft patients, the amount of bone stock after alveolar bone grafting is mostly measured and analyzed by two-dimensional imaging, which can result in a large error. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the 6-month osteogenesis of alveolar bone graft in alveolar cleft patients using cone beam CT. METHODS: Alveolar bone grafting was performed in 25 patients with unilateral complete alveolar cleft. The patients were followed up for 6 months after surgery and the osteogenesis of the bone graft was evaluated by CBCT. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: After the surgery, the labial bone support was better than the palatal one. There were significant differences in the alveolar bone thickness of the cleft region and the normal region of the central incisor as well as the alveolar bone thickness of the cleft region and the normal region of the canine tooth 0 mm distant to the alveolar crest. These findings indicate that the palatal bone support is less than the labial one, and the bone support of the central incisor is not satisfactory, which provide the basis for the tooth movement in the alveolar bone grafting and the orthodontics treatment.
出处 《中国组织工程研究》 CAS 北大核心 2016年第2期213-217,共5页 Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research
基金 江苏省连云港市科技局科研基金项目(SH1332)~~
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献39

  • 1李祖兵,钟林生,傅豫川,黄洪章,李宏礼.颏部骨移植修复牙槽裂的临床研究[J].华西口腔医学杂志,1996,14(2):125-128. 被引量:6
  • 2贾绮林 James DR 等.单侧完全性唇腭裂二期植骨的研究[J].口腔正畸学杂志,1998,5:4-6. 被引量:2
  • 3Jung MH,Yang WS,Nahm DS.Effects of upper lip closing force on craniofacial structures Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,2003; 123(1):58 被引量:1
  • 4Carter DR,Hayes WC.The compressive behavior of bone as a two phase porous structure.J Bone Joint Surg,1977; 59A:954 被引量:1
  • 5Daskalogiannakis J, Ross RB. Effect of alveolar bone grafting in the mixed dentition on maxillary growth in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate patients [ J ]. Cleft Palate Craniofac J, 1997,34 ( 5 ) : 455 -458. 被引量:1
  • 6Pena WA, Vargervik K, Sharma A, et al. The role of endosseous implants in the management of alveolar clefts [ J ]. Pediatr Dent, 2009,31 (4) :329-333. 被引量:1
  • 7Bergland O, Semb G, Abyholm FE. Elimination of the residual alveolar cleft by secondary bone grafting and subsequent orthodontic treatment [ J ]. Cleft Palate J, 1986,23 ( 3 ) : 175-205. 被引量:1
  • 8Hynes PJ, Earley MJ. Assessment of secondary alveolar bone grafting using a modification of the Bergland grading system[ J]. Br J Plast Surg,2003,56(7) :630-636. 被引量:1
  • 9Witherow H, Cox S, Jones E, et al. A new scale to assess radiographic success of secondary alveolar bone grafts [ J ]. Cleft Palate Craniofac J,2002,39 ( 3 ) :255-260. 被引量:1
  • 10Rosenstein SW, Long RE Jr, Dado DV, et al. Comparison of 2-D calculations from periapical and occlusal radiographs versus 3-D calculations from CAT scans in determining bone support for cleft-adjacent teeth following early alveolar bone grafts [ J ]. Cleft Palate Craniofac J, 1997,34 ( 3 ) : 199-205. 被引量:1

共引文献37

同被引文献25

引证文献6

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部