摘要
孙铁骑《生活儒学与宋明理学比较研究》一书,如作者所自道,志于"倡明孔子之道,以救世道人心"。然则世道人心需拯救者,为其有不正,故需以正而正其不正。循此逻辑发见,其首先判孔子儒宗为天道性命之学,更具体的说就是他所理解的《易传》"穷理尽性"之学。其有见于宋明理学以四书而非《易传》为宗,觉有悖于孔门儒宗,故而就生活儒学对宋明理学进行批判,实则方便地言说他所理解的性命之学,这其实正是宋明理学之前的形而上学;其所冀图重建的孔子儒学仍然是一种"前生活儒学"的传统形而上学。凡此种种问题的根本在于,该书没有着眼于生活本身,而是为了恢复儒学"定天下于一尊"的地位而作。这不仅有悖于生活儒学的宗旨,更是不切生活的实情:世间本来无儒学,"儒学为了生活而存在",生活本身才是一切之源。真正能够拯救世道人心、安顿人类生命的,不是天道性命之学,而是仁爱情感。
Comparative Study of Life-Confucianism with Song-ming Confucianism,as its author Sun Tieqi said,focuses on ＂advocating Confucianism in order to save the world and human mind. ＂However,it must be going wrong with the world and human mind,and it needs to be solved. Base on this,only Confucius＇ philosophy of heaven and nature can save the world and human mind,that is＂exploring thoroughly the logos and the intrinsic character ＂of Yi Zhuan. However,Song-ming Confucianism advocates The Four Books,therefore Sun Tieqi insists that Song-ming Confucianism is against Confucius＇ Confucianism. Thus,Sun Tieqi gets through Life-Confucianism criticizing to Song-ming Confucianism,and its intention is philosophy of heaven and nature as well. In one word,it is one of the traditional metaphysics which is ＂pre-Life-Confucianism＂. The root of these problems of this book is that it does not focus on life itself,but submits the world to the rule of Confucianism. However,this is not the intention of Life-Confucianism,and it is not the fact of life as well： There was no Confucianism in the world originally,＂Confucianism is for life＂,life is the foundation of all. Furthermore,only emotion as being,not philosophy of heaven and nature,can save and settle down the world and human mind.
出处
《宜宾学院学报》
2016年第1期32-39,共8页
Journal of Yibin University
关键词
孙铁骑
生活儒学与宋明理学比较研究
黄玉顺
生活儒学
宋明理学
天道性命之学
仁爱情感
Sun Tieqi
Comparative Study of Life-Confucianism with Song-ming Confucianism
Huang Yushun
Life-Confucianism
Song-ming Confucianism
philosophy of heaven and nature
emotion as being
