摘要
汉代今古文学派的《关雎》阐释是诗经学史上的重要争论点之一。一般认为,毛传郑笺将《关雎》认定为西周文王时代的称美之作,而今文三家诗以之为刺周康王之诗。通过辨析可以看出,三家"刺诗"之说应是着眼于《关雎》的"用诗之义"而非"作诗之义",是在肯定《关雎》称美文王的基础上申明诗作的刺时劝谏功能。因此,今古文《关雎》说解并无根本分歧。
Scholars of New Text Confucianism and Old Text Confucianism in Han Dynasty elucidate Guanju with different attitudes and methods. While the former ones state that the poem is an an-them for Zhouwenwang, while the latter ones interpret Guanju as a satirical poem to Zhoukangwang.This paper considers that there is no fundamentally difference among them. Scholars of New TextConfucianism emphasize that the function of Guanju is to persuade a monarch implicitly and politely,hence accentuating the political importance of Shijing in Zhou Dynasty.
出处
《求是学刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第2期134-139,共6页
Seeking Truth
关键词
《诗经·关雎》
三家诗
刺康王
作诗之义
用诗之义
Guanju
Sanjiashi
satire on Zhoukangwang
purpose of creation
purpose of application
