摘要
行政复议是解决行政争议、促进依法行政的有效制度,但复议机关是否做被告,对于复议制度功能发挥的影响很大。我国行政诉讼法原有的"维持则不当被告"的不合理规定,在很大程度上导致了复议机关的"维持会"形象,首次修改、施行不久的行政诉讼法对复议机关做被告的问题做了根本性且平衡性的制度改变,但学界和实务界对此都有不同看法,故须对主要争议点及修法背景、修改理据加以深入分析,而且新司法解释也带来一些新问题,新法实施中应予注意的事项很多,只有形成必要的全社会共识才有助于新法有效实施。
The administrative reconsideration is an effective system to resolve administrative disputes and to promote administration according to law. It is of great influence on the function of the administrative reconsideration system to clarify the issue whether the reconsideration organization should be the defendant. The invalidated version of China ’s Administrative Procedure Law specified that the reconsideration organization shall not be the defendant if reconsideration sustains the original act. This unreasonable provision labeled the reconsideration organization as ＂reconsideration-sustain organization＂to a large extent. The newly revised and implemented administrative procedure law has made a fundamental and balanced change on this issue. But the academics and practical circles hold some different views,thus it is necessary to make a deep analysis about the main points of controversy,the backgrounds and reasons of law revision. The new judicial interpretation has brought some fresh issues,and there are a lot of things to be considered in the implementation. Only with the consensus of the whole society can the new law be effectively implemented.
出处
《南都学坛（南阳师范学院人文社会科学学报）》
2016年第1期63-68,共6页
Academic Forum of Nandu:Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Nanyang Normal University
关键词
行政复议
复议机关
被告
“维持会”
新法实施
administrative reconsideration
reconsideration organization
defendant
＂ reconsideration-sustains organization＂
the implementation of the new law
