摘要
目的：探讨不同护理模式在全子宫切除中的临床价值.方法：选择某院妇科2013年1月-2015年1月之间收治的90例全子宫切除患者为观察对象,随机分为对照组和实验组,对照组接受常规护理,实验组接受临床护理路径干预.结果：实验组观察对象临床治疗后HAMD评分结果和并发症发生情况均明显优于对照组（P 〈0.05）.结论：全子宫切除患者接受临床护理路径干预,有助于患者临床治疗效果的巩固,以及并发症发生率的降低.
Objective:To explore the clinical value of different nursing models in total hysterectomy. Methods:200 cases of patients received total hysterectomy in a hospital from January 2013 to January 2015 were randomly divided into the control group and the experimental group,the control group received the rou-tine nursing care,while the experimental group received clinical nursing pathway intervention.Results:After clinical treatment,HAMD score and complication incidence of the experimental group were significantly bet-ter than those of the control group (P<0.05).Conclusion:For patients undergoing total hysterectomy,the clinical nursing pathway intervention is helpful to the consolidation of the clinical treatment effect and the de-crease of the incidence of complications.
出处
《数理医药学杂志》
2016年第4期624-625,共2页
Journal of Mathematical Medicine
关键词
护理模式
全子宫切除
临床价值
nursing model
total hysterectomy
clinical value
