摘要
太原金胜村1988M251铜器群在晋和三晋乃至整个东周时期的青铜器和考古学文化分期研究中都占有重要地位,但是关于它的年代考古学界一直存在争议。本文通过对青铜器形制进行比较研究,发现太原金胜村1988M251铜器群的年代不可能早至公元前475年;通过与年代清楚的楚文化系统典型铜器比较可知,太原金胜村1988M251铜器群的年代与随州擂鼓墩1978M1曾侯乙墓铜器群的年代比较接近,约在公元前433年前后。从晋、楚两大文化系统青铜器和考古学文化分期来看,约公元前453年前后物质文化面貌发生较大变化,以之作为春秋、战国时期的分界年代更为可取。
The bronze assemblage unearthed from context number 1988M251 at Jinshengcun, Taiynan, play an important role in the study of bronze typology and archaeological culture of the Eastern Zhou Dynasty. However, its exact date is highly debatable in the current scholarship. Based on typological analysis, this article proposes that the assemblage cannot predate 475 BC. In addition, the comparison between this assemblage and typical Chu-style bronzes demonstrates that the assemblage is contemporary to the bronze assemblages from the Zeng Marquis＇s tomb at Leigudun in about 433 BC. Furthermore, the comparative study of the bronze assemblages from the Jin and Chu cultures and their chronologies illustrates a remarkable transformation of material culture occurring around 453 BC. The author suggests this date is a more reasonable time-spot to divide the Spring-and-Autumn and Warring States periods.
出处
《考古与文物》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第1期75-89,共15页
Archaeology and Cultural Relics
基金
山东大学基本科研业务费专项资金(2015GN013)
山东省社科规划研究项目(15DKGJ01)资助研究成果
关键词
东周时期
太原金胜村
青铜器
Eastern Zhou Periods, Taiyuan Jinshengcun, Bronze
