摘要
清初阎若璩撰《尚书古文疏证》,以128条论据证明古文《尚书》之"伪",自此书问世三百多年来,一直好评如潮,盛行不衰。但笔者经过长期研究探索,发现其运用了二难推理、吹毛求疵、虚张声势、颠倒先后、主观武断、厚今薄古、胡编乱造、自相矛盾等8种不正当的考据方法,歪曲事实,欺骗读者。他的绝大部分论据都似是而非,因而是不能成立的。除了清朝政府和皇帝以"钦定"的形式,对阎氏《疏证》作了不实事求是的吹捧和褒扬外,其书之所以长期受到推崇,乃因为其考据方法极富欺骗性。本文就从十个方面,一一揭露其对历史事实的歪曲,如何欺骗天真的读者。文章最后还对阎氏《疏证》采用欺骗性考据的原因及其危害,作了简明的评析。详细揭露阎氏《疏证》考据方法的欺骗性,并分析其形成的原因与危害,在中国学术史上具有相当重大的积极意义。
Since the Annotation of The Book of History was published 300 years ago,it earned much acclaim and was quite popular among the readers. This paper revealed its distortion of history and deceptiveness from ten aspects. Furthermore,it also analyzed the reason why Yan's book adopted the deceptive textual research and its detriment to history. This is of great positive significance in the academic history of China.
出处
《史林》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第1期66-83,220,共18页
Historical Review
