摘要
获知权被认为是知情权的延伸,二者的区别主要表现在权利实现前提、取得信息内容、义务主体、权利实现途径等方面。我国对消费者转基因食品知情权的保护存在违法成本低、实施标识管理的农业转基因生物范围窄等问题,对消费者转基因食品获知权的保护没有制度上的保障。在当前现状下,我国应坚持实施转基因食品强制标识制度,发挥政府、消费者组织、经营者在保障消费者转基因食品获知权中的作用,实现转基因食品消费中的信息对称。
The right to being informed is considered as an extension of the right to know. The differences between the two rights are mainly reflected in the aspects like the premise of realizing the right, obtained information content, subject of duty, and way of realizing the right. In China, the existing problems in the protection for consumer＇s right of being informed in consumption of genetically modified food include low cost of illegal act and narrow scope of the genetically modified organisms under identification management. Additionally, no institutional guarantee is provided for protecting the consumer＇s right of being informed in consumption of genetically modified food. In the current situation, China should adhere to implementing the compulsory identification system for genetically modified food, try to play the roles of the government, consumer organizations, and the operators in guaranteeing consumers＇ right to know, and realize information symmetry in consumption of genetically modified food.
出处
《贵州警官职业学院学报》
2016年第1期77-82,共6页
Journal of Guizhou Police Officer Vocational College
基金
江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目(PAPD)
江苏省高校哲学社会科学研究项目(2012SJD820005)
江苏警官学院科学研究项目(11y04)
关键词
转基因食品
知情权
获知权
标识制度
genetically modified food
the right to know
the right to be informed
identification system
