摘要
历史学与中医学兼具科学性与人文性,二者具有相似的起源,在历史发展的进程中都曾遭遇"科学与否"的纷争,科学派史学的时代已经过去,将文化的观念渗透到历史研究的文化生命史观在一定程度上赋予历史学研究新的生命。这一点在中医的发展中亦可借鉴,进行中医与文化的相关研究十分必要。中医学要告别科学之争,珍惜源远流长的浩瀚医籍,将之发掘、继承、提高,从历史学、诠释学等人文学科借助力量,同时勤于临证,注重提升实践能力,或许是中医学未来发展的出路之一。
Both historiography and traditional Chinese medicine（TCM） science have scientificity and humanity and similar origins. They have encountered ＂scientific or not＂ in the process of historical development. The time for scientific school of history has passed. The concept of culture has permeated in cultural and life history of historical research, which gives new life to research on historiography to some extent. This can also be referred in the TCM development. It is of great necessity to conduct correlational research on TCM and culture. TCM science will bid farewell to the ＂scientific or not＂ dispute. The possible ways out for the future development of TCM science are： cherish long-standing and well-established TCM books and explore, inherit, and improve these books; develop with the help of humanities, such as historiography and textualism; focus on frequently searching evidence and promote practical ability.
出处
《中国中医药图书情报杂志》
2016年第2期14-17,共4页
Chinese Journal of Library and Information Science for Traditional Chinese Medicine
基金
中国中医科学院自由探索项目(ZZ0908037)
关键词
历史学
中医学
比
historiography
traditional Chinese medicine（TCM） science
comparative study
