摘要
干预主义者所持有的因果关系理论是单一标准的,他们认为因果关系的操控理论优于因果多元主义。但是,通过对因果多元主义的分类表明,伍德沃德通过批判形而上学的因果多元主义进而驳斥因果多元主义是有失偏颇的,因果关系的操控理论不仅和概念的因果多元主义和认识论-方法论的因果多元主义相互融合,而且支持概念的因果多元主义和认识论-方法论的因果多元主义。
The theories of causation held by the interventionist are mono-criterial, and they argue that the Manipulability Theory of Causation is superior to causal pluralism. However, following the classification of causal pluralism, it is found that Woodward＇s ideas that refute causal pluralism by criticizing metaphysical causal pluralism are too biased. The Manipulability Theory of Causation not only integrates with but also supports conceptual causal pluralism and epistemological-methodological causal pluralism.
出处
《自然辩证法通讯》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第2期28-34,共7页
Journal of Dialectics of Nature
