摘要
作为2012年《刑事诉讼法》修改的重要部分,违法所得特别没收程序在具体适用上存在较大理论和实践争议。违法所得没收程序的本质是刑事诉讼程序,民事诉讼程序说没有全面认识到该程序的本质。司法解释扩张了违法所得没收程序适用的案件范围,严重背离了程序法理和制定司法解释的基本原则。违法所得没收程序中"没收"的性质是"特别没收";证明对象包括:被追诉人存在犯罪事实且该被追诉人已死亡或潜逃,被追诉人存在的犯罪事实与请求没收的财物之间具有实质联系。对于"违法所得"和"其他涉案财物"的解释应当遵循实质联系的标准。
As an important part of the new Criminal Procedure Law, the confiscation procedures for illegal income has a great theoretical and practical controversy. The essence of the confiscation procedures for illegal income is the criminal procedure. Judicial interpretation of the scope of application violates the principle of procedure law and basic principle. The ＂ confiscation＂ of the confiscation procedures for illegal income is ＂special confiscation＂. There are two specific objects of proof： one is that a criminal suspect or defendant escapes and cannot present in court after being wanted for a year, or a criminal suspect or defendant dies, The other is that there is practical connection between the facts of the crime accused and the property to be confiscated. The interpretation of ＂illegal income＂ and ＂other property＂ should follow the principle of practical connection.
出处
《西华大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
2016年第1期89-94,共6页
Journal of Xihua University(Philosophy & Social Sciences)
关键词
违法所得没收程序
程序性质
适用范围
证明对象
没收财产范围
the confiscation procedures for illegal income
the properties of the procedure
scope of application
the object of proof
scope of forfeiture
