摘要
目的对血液透析结合血液灌流治疗尿毒症皮肤瘙痒的临床效果探讨。方法随机选取该院2013年5月—2015年5月接收并治疗的尿毒症皮肤瘙痒患者中随机选取60例,并将其分成两组,其中对照组患者实施常规血液透析,观察组患者在此基础上加上血液灌流,对两组患者的临床治疗效果对比。结果经过治疗,观察组患者的临床症状缓解有效率(83.33%)和对照组(66.67%)相比,显著偏高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论血液透析结合血液灌流治疗尿毒症皮肤瘙痒能够取得良好临床效果,值得推广。
Objective To observe the clinical effect of hemodialysis combined with blood perfusion in the treatment of uremic pruritus. Methods 60 cases with uremic pruritus admitted in our hospital from May 2013 to May 2015 were randomly selected and divided into two groups, the observation group and the control group. Patients in the control group were treated by the conventional hemodialysis, while those in the observation group were treated by hemodialysis combined with blood perfusion. And the clinical efficacy of the two groups was compared. Results After treatment, the observation group had much higher clinical symptoms relieving rate than the control group （83.33%vs 66.67%） （P〈0.05）. Conclusion Hemodialysis combined with blood perfusion in the treatment of uremic pruritus can achieve good clinical results, it is worth promoting.
出处
《中外医疗》
2015年第32期42-43,共2页
China & Foreign Medical Treatment
