期刊文献+

慢性乙型肝炎患者血小板指数与肝组织病理的关系 被引量:5

Correlation between platelet indices and liver pathological staging: an analysis of 167 patients with chronic hepatitis B
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)患者AST/血小板(PLT)比值(APRI)及ALT/PLT比值(BPRI)与肝组织病理改变的关系。方法收集2004年2月-2014年2月于柳州市人民医院行肝活组织检查的CHB患者167例,检测患者的血常规及肝功能,将APRI、BPRI与肝组织病理进行分析。计量资料组间比较采用Mann-Whitney U检验,分析评价采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线法。结果在肝组织病理炎症分级G0、G1、G2、G3、G4各组中,APRI进行比较,G1与G2、G3差异均具有统计学意义(P值均〈0.05);G0~1组与G2~4组的APRI比较差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。各组BPRI进行比较,G0与G4、G1与G2差异均有统计学意义(P值均〈0.05)。G0~1与G2~4进行比较,BPRI差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。在S0、S1、S2、S3、S4各组中,APRI、BPRI两两比较,S2与S3差异均有统计学意义(P值均〈0.05)。APRI、BPRI预测肝组织炎症G2~4的ROC曲线下面积分别为0.748、0.736(95%可信区间分别为0.669~0.827、0.653~0.819,P值均〈0.000 1),APRI、BPRI预测肝组织炎症G2~4级的最佳截断值分别为0.601、0.630,灵敏度分别63.6%、82.7%,特异度分别为74.5%、59.6%,约登指数分别为39.0%、42.4%。结论 APRI、BPRI可作为预测CHB患者肝组织炎症活动度的指标,但APRI、BPRI可能无法预测CHB患者肝纤维化分期。 Objective To investigate the values of aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index (APRI) and alanine aminotranstferase to platclet ratio index (BPRI) for the prediction of pathological changes in liver tissue in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Methods A total of 167 CHB patients who visited the People's Hospital of Liuzhou from February 2004 to February2014 were collected. Liver biopsy, routine blood test, and liver function test were performed, and then the correlation between APRI/BPRI and liver pathology was analyzed. The Mann - Whitney U test was applied for comparison of continuous data between groups, and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the predictive values of APRI and BPRI for liver pathological staging. Results APRI was compared between CO, G1, G2, G3, and G4 groups with different liver inflammation grades, and the G1 group had a significantly different APRI value than the G2 and G3 groups ( both P 〈 0.05 ) ; the CO - 1 group had a significantly different APRI value than the G2 - 4 group ( P 〈 0.05 ). BPRI was al- so compared between these groups, and it differed significantly between the CO group and G4 group and between the GI group and G2 group ( both P 〈 0.05 ) ; the CO - 1 group had a significantly different BPRI value than the G2 - 4 group ( P 〈 0.05 ). APRI and BPRI were com- pared between each two of SO, S1, s2, s3, and s4 groups, and they showed significant differences between the $2 and $3 groups ( P 〈 0. 05). The areas under the ROC curve of APRI and BPR1 for predicting liver inflammation G2 - 4 were 0. 748 and 0. 736, respectively (95% CI : 0. 669 - 0. 827 and 0. 653 - 0.819, respectively ; both P 〈 0. 000 1 ) ; the optimal cut - off values for APRI and BPRI to predict liver inflannnation G2 - 4 were 0. 601 and 0. 630, respectively, with sensitivity, specificity, and Youden index of 63.6%/82.7% , 74.5% / 59.6%, and 39. 0%/42.4%, respectively. Conclusion APRI and BPRI can be used to
出处 《临床肝胆病杂志》 CAS 2016年第1期106-109,共4页 Journal of Clinical Hepatology
基金 广西自然科学青年基金资助项目(0832037) 广西自然科学基金(0832117) 广西卫生厅自筹课题(z2014410) 柳州市人民医院院内课题(lry201306)
关键词 肝炎 乙型 慢性 血小板计数 病理学 hepatitis B, chronic platelet count pathology
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献62

共引文献17073

同被引文献55

引证文献5

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部