摘要
采用Pearson相关系数方法,探讨了常用期刊评价指标之间的相关性及其对评价机制和效果的影响。结果显示:指标之间普遍存在正相关性,但不同指标之间的相关度有差异。篇均得分指标、被引半衰期、他引总引比、互引指数、基金论文比5个指标,与其他指标的相关度显著弱于其他指标之间的相关度;统计规则相似的影响因子、文摘转载和网络下载三类指标之间呈强正相关;总体上文摘转载指标与引文计量指标之间存在中度或较强的正相关。
With Pearson correlation coefficientas instrument, correlations between different journal-evaluation indicators and its influences on evaluation machinisms and outcomes are explored. It is found that: correlations between indicators are all positive, but the degree of correlation is not the same. The correlations between the five indicators, ie the Average Score Per Article, the Cited Half-life, the Ratio of Other-cited,the Mutual Cited Index, and the Ratio of Funded Papers, and the other indicators is significantly weaker than that between any other two indicators; strong positive correlations exist among similar statistic indicators of three types, which are impact-factor indicators, digest-reprinting indicators, and WEB downloading indicators; medium or strong positive correlations exist between digest-reprinting indicators and citation-metric indicators.
出处
《图书与情报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第5期89-94,共6页
Library & Information
基金
国家社会科学基金青年项目"创新和质量导向的中国人文社科学术成果评价管理控制机制研究"(项目编号:12CTQ022)研究成果之一
关键词
学术评价
文摘转载
引文计量
相关性
academic evaluation
digest and reprinting
citation-metrics
correlation
