摘要
目的:比较研究不同方法检测静脉血和末梢血血小板的结果。方法:选取150例自愿参与实验研究的健康志愿者作为研究对象,对其实施血小板检测,按照采血途径的不同将其分为末梢血采血组和静脉血采血组,每组75例,分别采用血小板分析仪(Sysmex SE-9000全自动血细胞分析仪和KX-21血细胞分析仪)和手工法测量其血小板计数,并比较检测差异。结果:不同血细胞分析仪的不同通道检测获得的静脉血血小板计数结果与手工测量结果比较均无统计学差异,(P>0.05)。但末梢血的血小板计数检测结果有:手工测量结果大于Kx-21血细胞分析仪检测结果,大于SE-9000血细胞分析仪检测结果的情况,比较均有统计学差异,(P<0.05)。同时,末梢血的检测结果均显著低于静脉血,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:血小板检测过程中,通过静脉血采血,受检测方法影响小,且结果更为准确,颇具临床应用价值。
Objective： To contrast blood platelet results by venous blood testing and peripheral blood testing. Methods： According to the different sampling approaches, 150 cases of healthy volunteers were randomly divided into the peripheral blood group and the venous blood group, 75 cases for each group. blood platelet counting by whole blood platelet analyzer（Sysmex SE-9000 automatic blood cell Analyzer, KX-21 blood cell analyzer） and manual method were compared. Results： Blood platelet counting results by analyser testing and manual method were no significant difference, P〉0.05. but the results of peripheral blood counting had the cases as follows： manual measurement result was greater than those of Kx-21 blood cell analyzer and SE-9000 automatic blood cell Analyzer, there were significant differences（P〈0.05）.detecting results of peripheral blood was lower than that of venous blood, with statistical significance（P 0.05）.Conclusions： venous blood testing was more accurate during blood platelet testing, and worthy of popularization and application.
出处
《中医临床研究》
2016年第3期46-47,53,共3页
Clinical Journal Of Chinese Medicine
关键词
末梢血
静脉血
血小板
比较
Peripheral blood
Venous blood
Blood platelets
Contrast
