摘要
目的:观察不同波形电针对气滞血瘀型颈椎病疗效的影响。方法:将80例气滞血瘀型颈椎病患者随机分为2组,疏密波组及连续波组各40例,针刺得气后,颈夹脊穴上接G9805-C低频电针治疗仪,选择不同波形治疗,疗程20次。观察两组患者中医证候疗效及疼痛指标的变化。结果:中医证候疗效比较:疏密波组优于连续波组(P<0.05)。各疼痛指标比较:疏密波组PRI、VAS、PPI评分的降低程度明显大于连续波组(P<0.05)。结论:低频疏密波和低频连续波电针法均能改善气滞血瘀型颈椎病患者的中医证候状况、降低其疼痛程度,低频疏密波电针法对其改善效果优于低频连续波电针法(P<0.05),在降低其疼痛程度方面表现得更为突出。
Objective：To observe the influence of curative effect between acusector of different wave form for patients with the Qi stagnation and blood stasis cervical spondylosis. Methods：80 patients with the Qi stagnation and blood stasis cervical spondylosis radiculopathy were randomized into 2 groups,each group has 40 cases. One group received the dilatational wave of electro-acupuncture after needing cervical Jiaji points;the other group received the continuous wave of electro-acupuncture after needing cervical Jiaji points. The changes of the two groups were observed in patients with TCM syndrome curative effect and pain index. Results：The comparison of traditional Chinese medicine：The improvement of dilatational wave group is better than continuous wave group（P0.05）. The comparison of pain index：The improvement of patient＇s PRI,VAS,PPI score in dilatational wave group is better than which in continuous wave group. There was statistical difference（P0.05）. Conclusion：Acusector can improve cervical spondylosis patients＇ condition of traditional Chinese medicine syndrome and the pain intensity. The improvement of low frequency dilatational wave is more effective than low frequency continuous wave（P0.05）.
出处
《辽宁中医药大学学报》
CAS
2016年第2期185-187,共3页
Journal of Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
关键词
气滞血瘀型颈椎病
电针
颈夹脊穴
疏密波
连续波
波形
Qi stagnation and blood stasis cervical spondylosis
electro-acupuncture
cervical Jiaji acupoints
dilatational wave
continuous wave
wave
