期刊文献+

中文版攻击性问卷在成年男性罪犯中的试用 被引量:3

Psychometric Features of Aggression Questionnaire in Chinese Male Criminals
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:对攻击性问卷(AQ)在成年男性罪犯群体中进行初步的试用。方法:根据量表修订方法,随机选取北京某3所监狱的190名罪犯进行测验,分析中文版信效度。结果:①攻击性问卷得分及项目分析结果表明,成年男性罪犯在攻击性问卷上的得分比较均衡,有5道题目项目鉴别力系数低于0.3,剩余题目项目鉴别力良好(r〉0.348);②探索性因素分析得到问卷5个因素(特征根大于1.5,累积方差解释量为50.744),这5个因素分别为身体攻击、言语攻击、间接攻击、愤怒和敌意。项目的载荷范围在0.402-0.825之间;③问卷的5个分量表内容效度均在0.551-0.833之间(P〈0.01),具有良好的内容效度。选取WFS量表作为问卷的效标,相关系数均在0.574以上(P〈0.01),由此可见整个问卷具有较好的效标效度;④整个问卷的Cronbach'sα系数为0.797,5个分量表的Cronbach'sα系数在0.536-0.710范围内,整个量表的内部一致性良好,问卷分半信度均在0.770之上,重测信度为0.832,说明整个量表达到一定信度要求。结论:攻击性问卷在成年男性罪犯中试用具有较高信度和效度,可以作为测量罪犯攻击性的有效工具。 Objective:To examine the reliability and validity of Chinese version of the Aggression Questionnaire(AQ).Methods:According to the revised scale method,we randomly selected a sample of 190 male criminals in Beijing prisons who were given the test,the reliabilities and validities of Chinese version of AQ were examined.Results:①AQ score and item analysis showed that the AQ scores of the adult male criminals were well balanced,the most(except 5items)of the items had good item discrimination(r〉0.348);②The result of EFA had five factors(characteristic roots was greater than 1.5,the cumulative amount of variance explained 50.744%),the five factors were physical aggression,verbal aggression,indirect aggression,anger and hostility.The range of factor loading was between 0.402 and 0.825;③ The content validity of five subscales were between 0.551 and 0.833(P〈0.01).Selecting WFS as criterion,all correlation coefficients were above 0.574(P〈0.01).The Chinese version of AQ had a satisfactory validity;④The Cronbach sαcoefficient of the total scale was 0.797,and five subscales was 0.536-0.710.The test retest reliability coefficient was 0.832 for the total scale.All split-half reliability were above 0.770.The whole scale and five subscales were all good on reliability requirements.Conclusion:The Chinese version of AQ has high reliability and validity as an effective instrument for measuring aggression of male criminals.
作者 赵金龙 王臻
出处 《中国健康心理学杂志》 2016年第1期87-89,共3页 China Journal of Health Psychology
关键词 攻击性 罪犯 心理测量 探索性因素分析 Aggression Criminals Psychometric studies Exploratory factor analysis(EFA)
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Berkowitz L. Aggression: It's causes, consequences, and control [M].New York: McGraw-- Hill, 1993. 被引量:1
  • 2Buss A H,Durkee A.An inventory for assessing different kinds of hostility[J].Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1957,21 (4) : 343- 349. 被引量:1
  • 3Bushman B J, Cooper H M, Lemke K M.Meta-- analysis of factor analyses:An illustration using the Buss--Durkee hostility inven- tory[ J ]. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1991, 17 : 344-349. 被引量:1
  • 4Matt Vassar, William Hale.Reliability reporting across studies u- sing the Buss--Durkee Hostility Inventory[J].Journal of Inter- personal Violence, 2009,24 (1), 20-37. 被引量:1
  • 5Buss A H, Perry M. The aggression questionnaire[J].Journal of Personality Social Psychology, 1992,63(3) :452-459. 被引量:1
  • 6刘俊升,周颖,顾文瑜.Buss-Perry攻击性量表在青少年中的初步修订[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2009,17(4):449-451. 被引量:55
  • 7吕路,高兄和至,董冬,等.中文大学生版Buss-Perry攻击性量表的修订与信效度分析[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2013,27(5):378-383. 被引量:3
  • 8陈祉妍,朱宁宁,刘海燕.Wade宽恕量表与人际侵犯动机量表中文版的试用[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2006,20(9):617-620. 被引量:20
  • 9Lawshe C H.A quantitative approach to content validity[J].Per- sonnel Psychology, 1975,28 .. 563-575. 被引量:1

二级参考文献22

  • 1赵永乐,郑涌.游戏方式差异对电脑游戏者攻击性影响研究[J].西南师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2004,30(5):36-39. 被引量:5
  • 2张东宁,王有智.IAT测验对攻击性内隐社会认知的应用研究[J].心理学探新,2005,25(4):74-77. 被引量:23
  • 3戴春林,吴明证,杨治良.个体攻击性结构与自尊关系研究[J].心理科学,2006,29(1):44-46. 被引量:41
  • 4Buss AH,Durkee A. An inventory for assessing different kinds of hostility. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1957, 21 : 343-349. 被引量:1
  • 5Bushman BJ, Cooper HM, Lemke KM. Meta-analysis of factor analyses: An illustration using the Buss-Durkee hostility inventory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1991, 17 : 344-349. 被引量:1
  • 6Buss AH,Perry M. The aggression questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1992,63(3) : 452-459. 被引量:1
  • 7Harris JA. Confirmatory factor analysis of the aggression questionnaire. Behav Res Ther, 1995,8: 991-993. 被引量:1
  • 8Bryant FB,Smith BD. Refining the architecture of aggression:A measurement model for the Buss-Perry aggression questionnaire. J Res Pers,2001,35:138-167. 被引量:1
  • 9Ramirez J, Andreu JM, Fujihara T. Cultural sex differences in aggression:A comparison between Japanese and Spanish students using two different inventories. Aggress Behav, 2001,27:313-322. 被引量:1
  • 10Harris JA. A further evaluation of the aggression questionnaire:Issues of validity reliability. Behav Res Ther, 1997, 35 : 1047-1053. 被引量:1

共引文献75

同被引文献33

引证文献3

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部