摘要
英国刑法学中关于犯罪故意的概念,与德国刑法理论相比而言,同样存在着表象主义和意思主义。在结果可能性学说(结果盖然性学说)的场合下,故意概念的立场应当排除结果可能性说(结果盖然性说)的单一性,因为该学说均存在一定的缺陷和不足,难以实现理论自治,只有在故意概念的立法逻辑上坚持表象主义和意思主义的叠加效应,犯罪故意的概念才最具有合理性。凭借案例释明,主张思维上的选择是理解英国刑法故意核心内涵的有力工具,并对我国刑法的立法具有借鉴意义。
By contrast with the theory of criminal law of Germany , the concept of criminal intention of UK criminal law , there are still two theories including presentationism and concensualism . Under the circumstance of result possibility or result proba- bility, the position of concept of criminal intention shall exclude the simplicity ofresult possibility or result probability, because there are certain defects , which can not achieve the theoretical self - consistency. Therefore, legislative logic of concept of crim- inal intention shall emphasize thesuperimposed effect of presentationisrn and concensualism , it should be more reasonable. By means of case interpretation,it is insisted that thoughtful selection is a powerful tool to understand the concept core of criminal intention of UK criminal law, which provides certain reference for criminal legislation in Criminal law of China.
出处
《枣庄学院学报》
2016年第1期115-119,共5页
Journal of Zaozhuang University
关键词
英国刑法
犯罪故意
概念
立法反思
UK Criminal Law
Criminal Intention
Concept
Legislative Reflection
