期刊文献+

高管显性激励与代理成本关系研究述评与未来展望 被引量:14

The Relationship between Dominant Executive Incentives& Agency Costs:A Literature Review and Prospects
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文从最优契约理论、管理层权力理论和心理所有权理论等视角对高管显性激励安排与代理成本关系的研究成果进行了述评,发现该领域研究正在逐步由关注单一激励安排的局部均衡分析阶段,向更加注重协同效应的一般均衡分析阶段过渡。针对现有研究存在的不足,本文提出了未来研究的展望,包括正确区分股权和期权激励对代理成本的不同影响、系统考虑显性激励与隐性激励的协同效应、深化心理因素对高管激励安排的治理效果等。 This paper makes comments on the research achievements of the relationship between dominant executive incentives and agency costs from the perspectives of optimal contract theory, managerial power theory and psychological ownership theory. Then it argues that the research is developing gradually from the phase of partial equilibrium analysis of sin gle incentive arrangement to the phase of general equilibrium analysis which pays more at- tention to the synergistic effects. Based on the deficiencies of existing research, this paper puts forward future directions in this field, including exact distinction of different effects of equity and option incentives on agency costs, systematic consideration of the synergistic effects of dominant and implicit incentives, and deepening the governance effects of psycho- logical factors on executive incentive arrangement.
出处 《外国经济与管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第1期101-112,共12页 Foreign Economics & Management
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目(71272120) 国家自然科学基金青年项目(71302089)
关键词 高管显性激励 代理成本 薪酬激励 股权激励 期权激励 dominant executive incentive agency cost compensation incentive equity in-centive option incentive
  • 相关文献

参考文献33

  • 1Abeler J,et al.Reference points and effort provision[J].American Economic Review,2011,101(2):470-492. 被引量:1
  • 2Albuquerque A,et al.Peer choice in CEO compensation[J].Journal of Financial Economics,2013,108(1):160-181. 被引量:1
  • 3Benmelech E,et al.Stock-based compensation and CEO(dis)incentives[J].Quarterly Journal of Economics,2010,125(4):1769-1820. 被引量:1
  • 4Bizjak J,et al.Are all CEOs above average?An empirical analysis of compensation peer groups and pay design[J].Journal of Financial Economics,2011,100(3):538-555. 被引量:1
  • 5Brookman J and Thistle P.Managerial compensation:Luck,skill or labor markets[J].Journal of Corporate Finance,2013,21(1):252-268. 被引量:1
  • 6Chahine S and Goergen M.The two sides of CEO option grants at the IPO[J].Journal of Corporate Finance,2011,17(4):1116-1131. 被引量:1
  • 7Chen J,et al.Managerial power theory,tournament theory,and executive pay in China[J].Journal of Corporate Finance,2011,17(4):1176-1199. 被引量:1
  • 8Coles J,et al.Structural models and endogeneity in corporate finance:The link between managerial ownership and corporate performance[J].Journal of Financial Economics,2012,103:149-168. 被引量:1
  • 9Conyon M and He L.Executive compensation and corporate governance in China[J].Journal of Corporate Finance,2011,17(4):1158-1175. 被引量:1
  • 10Corea J,et al.The power of the Pen and executive compensation[J].Journal of Financial Economics,2008,88(1):1-25. 被引量:1

二级参考文献76

共引文献5759

同被引文献253

引证文献14

二级引证文献81

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部