摘要
不同于其他专业或职业,经济学专业竟没有对其行为的正式内部管理标准,而经济学家的判断通过政府决策,对上百万公民的生活产生了远超过其他高度规范专业的巨大影响。如本轮危机所示,经济学家错判的系统性失败,已导致公民生计不必要的乃至灾难性的损失。改变经济学研究困境的基本出路在于确立多元化的行为准则,以便于公众进一步追究经济学家的渎职行为。在致英国国会同行评审专门委员会的信件中,异端经济学会对同行评审过程弊端的案例分析及改革提案,具体指出了如何提高经济学科研成果和出版质量、决定科研基金分配等方面的多元化改革路径,涉及经济学专业评价、成果发表、科研人员的招聘和晋升等。
Unlike other professions or occupations,economics actually has no formal internal management standard for actions,while the judgment of economists has huge impact on the living of millions of citizens at the degree far higher than those of other highly regulated professions through government decision.As shown in the crisis,the systematic failure of misjudgment of economists has led to unnecessary and even catastrophic losses to the livelihood of citizens.The fundamental way of changing the dilemma of economics research is to determine the code of conduct of economists under the principle of pluralism for the public to further look into the misconduct of economists.In the letter to peer review committee of the British Parliament,the case studies of malpractice in the process of peer review and the reform proposals by the heterodox economics academy have specified plural reform approaches in the aspects such as improving the quality of economics scientific research and publication and deciding the distribution of scientific research fund.The reform approaches involve the evaluation of economics,result publication,recruitment and promotion of scientific research personnel and other areas.
出处
《当代经济研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第1期32-38,97,共7页
Contemporary Economic Research