期刊文献+

在多元化原则下确立经济学家的行为准则 被引量:1

Determine the Code of Conduct of Economists under the Principle of Pluralism
下载PDF
导出
摘要 不同于其他专业或职业,经济学专业竟没有对其行为的正式内部管理标准,而经济学家的判断通过政府决策,对上百万公民的生活产生了远超过其他高度规范专业的巨大影响。如本轮危机所示,经济学家错判的系统性失败,已导致公民生计不必要的乃至灾难性的损失。改变经济学研究困境的基本出路在于确立多元化的行为准则,以便于公众进一步追究经济学家的渎职行为。在致英国国会同行评审专门委员会的信件中,异端经济学会对同行评审过程弊端的案例分析及改革提案,具体指出了如何提高经济学科研成果和出版质量、决定科研基金分配等方面的多元化改革路径,涉及经济学专业评价、成果发表、科研人员的招聘和晋升等。 Unlike other professions or occupations,economics actually has no formal internal management standard for actions,while the judgment of economists has huge impact on the living of millions of citizens at the degree far higher than those of other highly regulated professions through government decision.As shown in the crisis,the systematic failure of misjudgment of economists has led to unnecessary and even catastrophic losses to the livelihood of citizens.The fundamental way of changing the dilemma of economics research is to determine the code of conduct of economists under the principle of pluralism for the public to further look into the misconduct of economists.In the letter to peer review committee of the British Parliament,the case studies of malpractice in the process of peer review and the reform proposals by the heterodox economics academy have specified plural reform approaches in the aspects such as improving the quality of economics scientific research and publication and deciding the distribution of scientific research fund.The reform approaches involve the evaluation of economics,result publication,recruitment and promotion of scientific research personnel and other areas.
出处 《当代经济研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第1期32-38,97,共7页 Contemporary Economic Research
  • 引文网络
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1A.Freeman.The Economists of Tomorrow:The Case for Assertive Pluralism in Economics Education[J].American Journal of Economics and Sociology,2010,69(5):1591-1613. 被引量:1
  • 2IEO.IMF Performance in the Run-Up to the Financial and Economic Crisis:IMF Surveillance in 200407[J].http://www.ieo-imf.org/ieo/pages/News Linkszo.aspx.2011-01-10. 被引量:1
  • 3A.Freeman.The Economists of Tomorrow:The Case for a Pluralist Subject Benchmark Statement for Economics[J].International Review of Economics Educatio,2009,8(02):23-40. 被引量:1
  • 4A.Denis,ed.Pluralism in Economics Education[J].International Review of Economics Educatio,2009,8(02). 被引量:1
  • 5F.Lee.The Research Assessment Exercise,the State and the Dominance of Mainstream Economics in British Universities[J].Cambridge Journal of Economics,2007,31(02):309325. 被引量:1
  • 6F.Lee,S.Harley.Peer Review,the Research Assessment Exercise and the Demise of Non-Mainstream Economics[J].Capital and Class,1998,(66):2353. 被引量:1
  • 7D.Gillies.Economics and Research Assessment Systems[A].Working Paper[Z].University College London,2010. 被引量:1
  • 8G. DeMartino. "I Do Solemnly Swearn" : On the Need for and Content of Professional Economic Ethics [ A ]. J. Harvey, R. Garnett. Future Directions for Heterodox Economics[ C ]. Michigan: University of Michigan Press, 2008. 被引量:1
  • 9D. Colander et al. The Financial Crisis and the Systemic Failure of Academic Economics[ A]. Kiel Working Paper[ Z]. Kiel Institute for the World Economy, 2009:1489. 被引量:1

同被引文献8

  • 1萨缪尔森 诺德豪斯.《经济学》[M].中国发展出版社,1992年版.. 被引量:14
  • 2马歇尔.《经济学原理》[M].商务印书馆,1983年版.. 被引量:6
  • 3马克斯·韦伯.《社会科学方法论》,第21页,中国人民大学出版社,1999年版. 被引量:2
  • 4威廉·罗雪尔.《历史方法的国民经济学大纲》,商务印务书馆1986版,第1 2 页. 被引量:1
  • 5阿尔弗雷德·艾克纳.《经济学为什么还不是一门科学》,北京大学出版社1990年版,第5 6 页. 被引量:1
  • 6约翰·由维尔·凯恩斯.《政治经济学的范围与方法》,华夏出版社1998年版,第4 3 页. 被引量:1
  • 7哈耶克.《个人主义与经济秩序》,商务印书馆2003年版,第3 7 页. 被引量:1
  • 8萨缪尔森.《经济分析基础》,北京经济学院出版社1990年版,第8 页. 被引量:1

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

;
使用帮助 返回顶部