期刊文献+

药品安全性证据分级分类探索研究——构建中药上市后安全性证据体 被引量:13

To explore evidence evaluation for harm: establishing the body of evidence for harm for postmarketing traditional Chinese medicine
原文传递
导出
摘要 借鉴循证医学既有证据分类、分级的成功经验,探索中药上市后安全性证据评价、分类和分级标准并形成安全性证据评价的基本框架,从点、线、面、体多个角度综合不同证据源,构建中药上市后安全性证据体,为今后该领域证据体系的研究提供方法学和技术支撑。 There has been much difference between effectiveness and harm in evidence evaluation. Many evidence ranking or grading systems have been developed by researchers in the world. However, no evidence ranking or grading systems are based on safety research reality. Those existing evidence ranking or grading systems are prone to evaluating effectiveness evidence not proper for harm ev- idence. It is necessary to develop a new system for harm evidence. We put forward to establishing the body of evidence for harm for postmarketing traditional Chinese medicine as required by our daily research work. We do hope such an ideal could be helpful and in- dicative for evidence evaluation for harm.
出处 《中国中药杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第24期4723-4727,共5页 China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica
基金 中央级公益性科研院所基本业务费项目(Z0406 PY1303) 2014年第七批博士后特别项目(2014T70202) 国家"重大新药创制"科技重大专项(2009ZX09502-030)
关键词 安全性证据 上市后中药 证据分级 循证医学 body of evidence postmarteting traditional Chinese medicine evidence grading evidence based medicine
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1Evidence Based Medicine Working Group.Evidence based medi- cine.A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine[J].JAMA,1992,268:2420. 被引量:1
  • 2Trisha Greenhalgh.Evidence based medicine:a movement in cri- sis[J].BMJ,2014,348:g3725. 被引量:1
  • 3陈耀龙,杨克虎,姚亮,田金徽,拜争刚,马彬,李秀霞.GRADE系统方法学进展[J].中国循证儿科杂志,2013,8(1):64-65. 被引量:34
  • 4Gordon Guyatt,Andrew D.Oxman,Elie Akl,Regina Kunz,Gunn Vist,Jan Brozek,Susan Norris,Yngve Falck-Ytter,Paul Glasziou,Hans deBeer,Roman Jaeschke,David Rind,Joerg Meerpohl,Philipp Dahm,Holger J.Schünemann,GRADE工作组,李幼平,杨晓妍,蒋兰慧,沈建通.GRADE指南:Ⅰ.导论--GRADE证据概要表和结果总结表[J].中国循证医学杂志,2011,11(4):437-445. 被引量:277
  • 5Howard Balshem,Mark Helfanda,Holger J.Schunemann,Andrew D.Oxman,Regina Kunz,Jan Brozek,Gunn E.Vist,Yngve Falck-Ytter,Joerg Meerpohl,Susan Norris,Gordon H.Guyatt,GRADE工作组,李幼平,杨晓妍,高霑.GRADE指南:Ⅲ.证据质量分级[J].中国循证医学杂志,2011,11(4):451-455. 被引量:153
  • 6Gordon H.Guyatt,Andrew D.Oxman,Shahnaz Sultan,Paul Glasziou,Elie A.Akl,Pablo Alonso-Coello,David Atkins,Regina Kunz,Jan Brozek,Victor Montori,Roman Jaeschke,David Rind,Philipp Dahm,Joerg Meerpohl,Gunn Vist,Elise Berliner,Susan Norris,Yngve Falck-Ytter,M.Hassan Murad,Holger J.Schünemann,代表GRADE工作组,李幼平,杨晓妍,李玲,王应强.GRADE指南:Ⅸ.证据质量升级[J].中国循证医学杂志,2011,11(12):1459-1463. 被引量:29
  • 7Gordon H.Guyatt,Andrew D.Oxman,Victor Montori,Gunn Vist,Regina Kunz,Jan Brozek,Pablo Alonso-Coello,Ben Djulbegovic,David Atkins,Yngve Falck-Ytter,John W.Williams Jr.,Joerg Meerpohl,Susan L.Norris,Elie A.Akl,Holger J.Schünemann,代表GRADE工作组,李幼平,王莉,钟大可,蒋兰慧.GRADE指南:Ⅴ.证据质量评价--发表偏倚[J].中国循证医学杂志,2011,11(12):1430-1434. 被引量:80
  • 8Gordon H.Guyatt,Andrew D.Oxman,Gunn Vist,Regina Kunz,Jan Brozek,Pablo Alonso-Coello,Victor Montori,Elie A.Akl,Ben Djulbegovic,Yngve Falck-Ytter,Susan L.Norris,John W.Williams Jr.,David Atkins,Joerg Meerpohl,Holger J.Schünemann,GRADE工作组,李幼平,杨晓妍,李鸿浩,李玲.GRADE指南:Ⅳ.证据质量分级--研究的局限性(偏倚风险)[J].中国循证医学杂志,2011,11(4):456-463. 被引量:66
  • 9Gordon H.Guyatt,Andrew D.Oxman,Regina Kunz,James Woodcock,Jan Brozek,Mark Helfand,Pablo Alonso-Coello,Paul Glasziou,Roman Jaeschke,Elie A.Akl,Susan Norris,Gunn Vist,Philipp Dahm,Vijay K.Shukla,Julian Higgins,Yngve Falck-Ytter,Holger J.Schünemann,代表GRADE小组,李幼平,杨晓妍,王莉,蔡羽嘉,陈群飞.GRADE指南:Ⅶ.证据质量评价--不一致性[J].中国循证医学杂志,2011,11(12):1444-1451. 被引量:40
  • 10刘建平.中医药临床试验的方法学问题与挑战:循证医学的观点[J].中西医结合学报,2006,4(1):1-6. 被引量:52

二级参考文献161

  • 1刘建平.临床试验效应的表达——指标及其意义[J].中国中西医结合杂志,2004,24(8):677-679. 被引量:26
  • 2詹思廷.中医药学术期刊随机对照临床试验文章评阅及建议[J].中国中西医结合杂志,1999,19(9):568-568. 被引量:16
  • 3Liu JP, Kjaergard LL, Gluud C. Misuse of randomization: a review of Chinese randomized trials of herbal medicines for chronic hepatitis B. Am J Chin Med,2002, 30(I): 173-176. 被引量:1
  • 4Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, et al. Empirical evidence of bias:Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA, 1995, 273(5): 408 412. 被引量:1
  • 5Jadad A. Randomized controlled trials. London: BMJ Publishing Group, 1998. 1-9. 被引量:1
  • 6World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki:ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA, 2000, 284(23): 3043-3045. 被引量:1
  • 7Juni P, Altman DG, Egger M. Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials. BMJ, 2001, 323(7303):42-46. 被引量:1
  • 8Field M, Lohr K. Clinical practice guidelines: directions for a new program. Washington, DC: National Academic Press; 1990. 被引量:1
  • 9Schunemann HJ, Woodhead M, Anzueto A, et al. A vision statement on guideline development for respiratory disease: the example of COPD. Lancet, 2009, 373: 774-779. 被引量:1
  • 10Guyatt G, Vist G, Falck-Ytter Y, et al. An emerging consensus on grading recommendations? ACP J Club, 2006, 144(1): A8-9. 被引量:1

共引文献627

同被引文献178

引证文献13

二级引证文献72

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部