期刊文献+

中小学生学业自我概念与学业成绩的交叉滞后分析:符合交互影响模型,还是发展观? 被引量:19

Cross-legged Regression Analysis of Relationship between Academic Self-concept and Academic Achievement in Primary and Middle School Students: Test of Reciprocal Effect Model and Development Perspective
原文传递
导出
摘要 以小学五年级、初二年级和高二年级共357名学生为研究对象,采用10个月的追踪设计,运用交叉滞后回归分析,旨在揭示中小学生学业自我概念与学业成绩的相互影响,检验交互影响模型和发展观。结果发现,在前、后测中,小五学生学业自我概念得分呈现发展性差异,且均显著高于初二和高二学生;中小学生样本总体T1时间学业自我概念能显著正向预测T2时间学业成绩,T1时间学业成绩能显著正向预测T2时间学业自我概念,符合交互影响模型;小学五年级T1时间学业自我概念能显著正向预测T2时间学业成绩,符合自我增强模型;初二和高二学生T1时间学业成绩能显著正向预测T2时间学业自我概念,符合技能发展模型。结果表明随着年龄的变化,中小学生学业自我概念与学业成绩的因果关系顺序也在发生变化,支持发展观。 The present 10-months longitudinal study aimed to explore reciprocal relations between academic selfconcept and academic achievement in primary and middle school students,test reciprocal effect model and development perspective. 357 students from one primary school,one junior high school and one high school were investigated by Self Description Questionnaire. The results indicated that academic self-concept scores of Grade 5 in primary school has developmental differences and was higher than middle school students significantly. Cross-lagged regression analyses for the total samples were in line with reciprocal effect model. For students at Grade 5 in primary school,the first academic self-concept can predict subsequent academic achievement. But for middle school students,the first academic achievement can predict subsequent academic self-concept. These results indicated that causal ordering of academic self-concept and achievement changed when students ’ age transformed,and development perspective was confirmed in this study.
出处 《心理发展与教育》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第1期81-88,共8页 Psychological Development and Education
关键词 学业自我概念 学业成绩 中小学生 交互影响模型 发展观 academic self-concept academic achievement primary and middle school students reciprocal effect model development perspective
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献44

  • 1孙圣涛,卢家楣.自我意识及其研究概述[J].心理学探新,2000,20(1):17-22. 被引量:64
  • 2贺岭峰.自我概念研究的概述[J].心理科学进展,1996,6(3):41-44. 被引量:59
  • 3张怀春,杨昭宁.师范大学生学业自我概念差异分析[J].心理科学,2003,26(2):381-381. 被引量:22
  • 4Helrnke K. G. & Van Aken M, A. G. The causal ordering of academie achievement and self - eoneept of ability during elementary school: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology,1995, 87: 624-637. 被引量:1
  • 5Byrne B. M. Academic self- concept: Its structure, measurement,and relation to academic achievement. In: B. A. Bracken (Ed.).Handbook of self- concept. New York: Wiley, 1996:287 - 316. 被引量:1
  • 6Marsh lq. W. The causal ordering of academic self - concept and academic achievement: A multi- wave, longitudinal panel analysis:Journal of Educational Psychology, .1990, 82: 646- 656. 被引量:1
  • 7Marsh H. W. Byme B. M, & Yeung A, S. Causal ordering of academic self - concept and achievement: Reanalysis of a pioneering study and revised recommendations. Educational Psychologist, 1999,34 : 154 - 157. 被引量:1
  • 8Frederic Guay, Marsh H. W. & Michel Boivin. Academic self-concept and academic achievement: Developmental perspectives on their causal ordering. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2003, 95 :124 - 136. 被引量:1
  • 9Skaalvik E. M. & Valas H. Relations among achievement, self-concept, and motivation in mathematics and language arts: Alongitudinal study. The Journal of Experimental Education, 1999,67: 135- 149. 被引量:1
  • 10Shavelson R J., Hubner .1 J., Stanton G C. Self - concept:Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 1976, 46:407- 441. 被引量:1

共引文献205

同被引文献204

引证文献19

二级引证文献53

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部