期刊文献+

工程研发在Knight不确定性下的最优投资决策

Optimal Investment Decision of Engineering R&D under Knight Uncertainty
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对工程研发过程中所包含的Knight不确定性可能会造成投资上的损失,提出了工程研发投资决策模型。该模型以两个竞争性工程研发团队为例,量化了Knight不确定性对投资的影响,分析了团队自身和竞争者的投资决策,利用实物期权理论,对工程研发的决策收益进行评估,最后经过期权博弈得到了工程研发投资的最优决策。该模型考虑了竞争者的存在,可以精确地对工程研发的4种投资决策估值,由期权博弈分析得到的结果可知:实物期权的方法比传统的净现值方法的评估准确度有较大的提高,与不考虑不明确性偏好相比,工程研发在Knight不确定性下会有不同的最优投资决策,并且所得结果与实际投资决策经验更加相符,增强了投资决策制定的科学性,也保证了工程研发团队的竞争优势和收益最大化。 Aiming at the problem that in the process of engineering RD Knight uncertainty could cause loss in investment,an engineering RD investment decision model was proposed.This model took two competitive engineering RD teams as the examples to quantify the Knight uncertainty,and analyze the investment decisions of the teams and their competitors.According to the real share option theory,the investment decision payoffs of the engineering RD can be assessed.Through option game analysis,the optimal decisions are obtained under competitive conditions.The model can accurately evaluate four kinds of investment decisions;and the results show that real share option method is more improved than net present value method in the assessment of engineering RD;there will be corresponding different optimal investment decisions under Knight uncertainty.The results also accord with the practical experience,ensuring the competitive advantage and profit maximization for engineering RD teams.
出处 《西安交通大学学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第1期151-156,共6页 Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70871030) 秦皇岛市科学技术研究与发展计划资助项目(201402B041)
关键词 工程研发 最优投资决策 期权博弈 KNIGHT不确定性 engineering R&D optimal investment decisions option game Knight uncertainty
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1韩立岩,泮敏.基于奈特不确定性随机波动率期权定价[J].系统工程理论与实践,2012,32(6):1175-1183. 被引量:22
  • 2张慧,陈晓兰,聂秀山.不确定环境下再装股票期权的稳健定价模型[J].中国管理科学,2008,16(1):25-31. 被引量:17
  • 3DRIOUCHI T, TRIGEORGIS L, GAO Y. Choquet- based European option pricing with stochastic (and fixed) strikes VJ:. OR Spectrum , 2015, 37(3): 787- 802. 被引量:1
  • 4GHOSH S, TROUTT M D. Complex compound op- tion models-Can practitioners truly operationalize them [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2012, 222(3) : 542-552. 被引量:1
  • 5THIJSSEN J ] J, HUISMAN K J M, KORT P M. Symmetric equilibrium strategies in game theoretic real option models [J]- Journal of Mathematical Econom- ics, 2012, 48(4): 219-225. 被引量:1
  • 6KOUSSIS N, MARTZOUNOS S H, TRIGEORGIS L. Multi-stage product development with exploration, value-enhancing, preemptive and innovation options [J]. Journal of Banking : Finance, 2013, 37 (1): 174-190. 被引量:1
  • 7MARGRABE W. The value of an option to exchange one asset for another E J:. The Journal of Finance, 1978, 33(1): 177-186. 被引量:1
  • 8CARR P. The valuation of sequential exchange oppor- tunities rJ:. The Journal of Finance, 1988, 43 (5):. 1235-1256. 被引量:1
  • 9PAXSON D A. Sequential American exchange proper- ty options [J]. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 2007, 34(1): 135-157. 被引量:1
  • 10PENNINGS E, SERENO L. Evaluating pharmaceuti- cal R:D under technical and economic uncertainty [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2011, 212(2) : 374-385. 被引量:1

二级参考文献33

  • 1张慧.条件g-期望与相关风险测度[J].山东大学学报(理学版),2005,40(3):34-40. 被引量:9
  • 2傅强,喻建龙.股票价格服从指数O-U过程的再装期权定价[J].经济数学,2006,23(1):36-40. 被引量:9
  • 3Knight F H. Risk, Uncertainty and Profit[M]. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, Reprinted, 1985. 被引量:1
  • 4Bewley T. Knightian decision theory: Part I[R]. Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper No. 807, Yale University, 1986. 被引量:1
  • 5Epstein L G, Wang T. Intertermporal asset pricing under Knightian uncertainty[J]. Econometrics, 1994, 62: 283-322. 被引量:1
  • 6Gilboa I. Expected utility theory with purely subjective non-additive probabilities[J]. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 1987, 16: 65-88. 被引量:1
  • 7Schmeidler D. Subjective probability and expected utility without additivity[J]. Econometrica, 1989, 57:571 587. 被引量:1
  • 8Gilboa I, Schmeidler D. Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior[J]. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 1989, 18: 141-153. 被引量:1
  • 9Hansen L P, Sargent T J. Robust control and model uncertainty[J]. American Economic Review, 2001, 91: 60-66. 被引量:1
  • 10Kogan L, Wang T. A simple theory of asset pricing under model uncertainty[R]. Working Paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2003. 被引量:1

共引文献36

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部