摘要
学术不端行为需要作者与编辑共同抵制。第三方平台代投属学术不端行为,编辑已总结出若干识别第三方平台代投的线索,但线索不能作为认定学术不端行为的证据。在认定第三方平台代投时,需要坚持四条识别原则,以避免因误判而带来的消极影响。同时编辑部内还需完善事实认定、争议处理、投稿审稿制度。作者应当抵制第三方代投,编辑也应该谨慎识别第三方代投,共同避免因误伤给彼此带来的消极影响,净化学术论文出版环境。
Both authors and editors need to boycott academic misconduct. The act of submission from third-party platform is a kind of academic misconduct, and editors have summarized a set of clues to identify it. But the clues cannot be the evidence that identifies academic misconduct. When editors are identifying the wrong doers, they need to stand fast and adhere to four principles to avoid the negative impacts caused by misjudgment. Meanwhile, editors need to perfect the institutions of truth affirmation, dispute settlement, and procedures of submitting and reviewing manuscripts.The authors need to reject third-party submission delegates, while editors need to be cautious to identify those illegal submission delegates, so that both authors and editors can avoid the negative impacts caused by misjudgment, and purify the environment of academic publication.
作者
杨宇琦
YANG Yu-qi(Department of Sociology,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430072,China)
出处
《编辑之友》
CSSCI
北大核心
2019年第3期95-99,共5页
Editorial Friend
关键词
第三方平台代投
学术不端行为
证据与线索
认定
submission from third-party platform
academic misconduct
evidence and clue
identify
