摘要
民初立法及司法材料的复杂来源及零散特征,导致如何搭配历史与体系论述成为以描述为前提所进行的民法史研究中所面对的技术前提。前者要求精确说明对象的时间序列,才可能在时间关系中把握其历史关系,从而了解问题的现实基础。但时间序列却可能导致强调体系协调性的法律知识本身,由于历史偶然性,而无法在历时导向的叙述中完整展现其体系;从而间接导致法史知识中法学因素的淡化,无法显示其专属于法学的价值。本篇拟以民初合伙材料为具体对象,初探矛盾的产生原因及其协调方式。
From pure technical perspective, historical account and systematical account are two elementary methods to the depiction of legal history of the early Republic of China. But each method has its own focus, which seems contradictory to another. Thus how to cast these two methods into one framework becomes a question. Through analysis of the sources of the law of partnership in the early Republic of China, this article is going to reveal the causes of the said problem and try to give a primary solution to it.
出处
《北京大学研究生学志》
2007年第3期77-85,共9页
Graduate Students' Journal of Peking University
关键词
历史叙述
体系性叙述
historical account
systematical account
