期刊文献+

缬沙坦单用与联合用药治疗原发性高血压有效性和安全性的Meta分析 被引量:17

Efficacy and Safety of Valsartan Alone or Combined Therapy in the Treatment of Essential Hypertension:A Meta-analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价缬沙坦单用与联合用药治疗原发性高血压的有效性与安全性。方法计算机检索Cochrane图书馆的Cochrane对照试验注册数据库(2015年第2期)、CBM、Medline、Embase、PubMed、CNKI、VIP、万方数据资源(截至2015年6月)。由2名评价者按Cochrane协作网推荐的简单评价法独立评价并交叉核对纳入研究的质量,对同质研究采用RevMan 5.3.5软件进行Meta分析。结果共纳入21个随机对照试验,包括8 743例患者。Meta分析结果显示:缬沙坦单药治疗原发性高血压的有效率优于对照组,治疗后收缩压、舒张压及不良反应发生率无统计学差异;缬沙坦联合用药治疗后收缩压、舒张压及不良反应发生率明显优于缬沙坦单药治疗,差异有统计学意义。结论缬沙坦联合1种或1种以上的降压药治疗原发性高血压可能更安全有效,推荐临床在治疗原发性高血压时采用联合用药。 Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of valsartan alone or combined therapy in the treatment of essential hypertension.Methods The CENTRAL,CBM,Medline,Embase,PubMed,CNKI,VIP and Wanfang data were searched for RCTs published until June 2015 on valsartan monotherapy or combination therapy for the treatment of essential hypertension.Two reviewers independently retrieved RCTs based on inclusion and exclusion criteria,assessed the quality of included trials,and extracted relevant data.The data were analyzed by using RevMan 5.3.5software package.Results A total of21 RCTs,including 8 743 patients,were finally included.Meta-analysis results showed that the efficacy of valsartan monotherapy was superior to that in control group.There were no significant differences in the systolic blood pressure,diastolic blood pressure and the incidence of adverse side effects between valsartan monotherapy group and control group.However,the improvement in the systolic blood pressure,diastolic blood pressure and the incidence of adverse side effects were better in valsartan combination group than in valsartan monotherapy group and there was a statistically significant difference(P0.05).Conclusion Valsartan combined with one or more antihypertensive drugs is more safe and effective than valsartan monotherapy in the treatment of essential hypertension.Valsartan combination administration is recommended to treat essential hypertension in clinical practice.
出处 《华中科技大学学报(医学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第6期725-730,736,共7页 Acta Medicinae Universitatis Scientiae et Technologiae Huazhong
基金 国家"十二五"科技支撑计划资助项目(No.2013BAI06B04)
关键词 缬沙坦 联合用药 原发性高血压 随机对照试验 META分析 valsartan combination administration essential hypertension randomized controlled trials Meta-analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1DeCarli C. Blood pressure control and cognitive performance: something to think about with aging[J]. JAMA, 2015, 313 (19) : 1963-1964. 被引量:1
  • 2Arosio E,De Marchi S,Prior M, et al, H aemodynamic effects of AT1 inhibition and Caz+-channel blockade in hypertensive patients during isometric stress[J]. J Hum Hypertens, 2006,20(3) : 201-205. 被引量:1
  • 3Bavanandan S, Morad Z,Ismail O, et al. A comparison of val sartan and perindopril in the treatment of essential hyperten- sion in the malaysian population[J]. Med J MaLaysia, 2005,60 (2) :158-162. 被引量:1
  • 4Malacco E, Santonastaso M, Vari N A, et al. Comparison of valsartan 160 mg with lisinopril 20 rag,given as monotherapy or in combination with a diuretic,for the treatment of hyper- tension:the Blood Pressure Reduction and Tolerability of Val- sartan in Comparison with Lisinopril (PREVAIL) study [J]. Clin Ther, 2004,26 (6): 855-865. 被引量:1
  • 5Elliott W J, Calhoun D A, DeLueca P T, et al. Losartan versus valsartan in the treatment of patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension: data from a multieenter, randomized, double-blind, 12-week trial[J]. Clin Ther, 2001,23 (8) : 1166- 1179. 被引量:1
  • 6Fogari R, Preti P, Derosa G, et al. Effect of antihypertensive treatment with valsartan or atenolol on sexual activity and plasma testosterone in hypertensive men[J]. Eur J Clin Phar- macol,2002,58(3) :177-180. 被引量:1
  • 7Jan G, Edzard S, Sabine P, et al. Antiproteinuric effects of an- giotensin receptor blockers: telmisartan versus valsartan in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and overt nephropathy[J]. Nephrol Dial Transpl, 2008, 23 (10) : 3174- 3183. 被引量:1
  • 8Klingbeil A U,Stefan J,Schneider M P, et al. ATl-receptor blockade improves augmentation index; a double-blind, ran domized, controlled study[J]. J Hypertens, 2002, 20 (12) : 2423-2428. 被引量:1
  • 9Lacourci~re Y, Wright J T Jr, Samuel R, et al. Effects of force-titrated valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide versus amlodip- ine/hydrochlorothiazide on ambulatory blood pressure in pa tients with stage 2 hypertenslon:the EVALUATE study[J]. Blood Press Monit,2009~14(3) :112-120. 被引量:1
  • 10Lee I T,Hung Y J,Chen J F,et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety profiles of two fixed-dose combinations of antihy- pertensive agents, amlodipine/benazepril versus valsartan/ hydrochlorothiazide,in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension .. a 16-week,muhicenter,randomized,double- blind,noninferiority study[J]. Clin Ther, 2012,34 (8) : 1735- 1750. 被引量:1

二级参考文献13

共引文献34

同被引文献145

引证文献17

二级引证文献125

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部