摘要
目的对心血管内科急性心绞痛的治疗方法进行分析探讨。方法将我院心血管内科2014年1月~2015年1月收治的114例急性心绞痛患者随机分为对照组与观察组,对照组57例患者采用常规治疗,观察组57例患者在常规治疗的基础上加用氯吡格雷治疗,对比两组患者的治疗效果及安全性。结果观察组的治疗有效率为98.25%,对照组的治疗有效率为75.44%,观察组的治疗有效率明显高于对照组,P〈0.05,差异具有统计学意义。观察组的血浆黏度、全血黏度及血浆纤维蛋白原值明显低于对照组,P〈0.05,差异具有统计学意义。观察组复发率为5.26%,对照组复发率为19.30%,观察组的复发率明显低于对照组,P〈0.05,差异具有统计学意义。结论对心血管内科急性心绞痛患者在常规治疗的基础上加用氯吡格雷治疗可有效缓解患者的临床症状,提高治疗效果,在临床上值得推广应用。
Objective To investigate the therapeutic methods for acute angina pectoris in Department of Cardiology. Methods A total of 114 patients with acute angina pectoris who were hospitalized and treated in Department of Cardiology in our hospital from January 2014 to January 2015 were randomized into control group and observation group, with 57 patients in each group. The patients in the control group received conventional treatment, and those in the observation group received clopidogrel in addition to the conventional treatment. Therapeutic effect and safety were compared between the two groups. Results Compared with the control group, the observation group had a significantly higher response rate（98.25% vs 75.44%, P〈0.05）, as well as significantly lower plasma viscosity, blood viscosity, and plasma fibrinogen（all P〈0.05）. The observation group also had a significantly lower recurrence rate than the control group（5.26% vs 19.30%, P〈0.05）. Conclusion Additional administration of clopidogrel on the basis of the conventional treatment can effectively relieve clinical symptoms and improve the treatment outcome, and is worthy of wide clinical application.
出处
《心血管病防治知识（学术版）》
2015年第12期29-31,共3页
Prevention and Treatment of Cardiovascular Disease
关键词
心血管内科
急性心绞痛
氯吡格雷
Department of Cardiology
Acute angina pectoris
Clopidogrel
