摘要
近年来,知识产权司法审判为充分发挥知识产权审判职能作用,为全面深化改革和实施创新驱动发展战略提供了有力的司法保障,并且一直在不遗余力地为加大知识产权司法保护努力。基于智慧财产与生俱来的无形性,导致知识产权侵权的低门槛和知识产权维权的高难度。很多大企业依然感觉知识产权维权困难重重,举证难一直是他们维权的瓶颈,最为存在的突出问题是当前举证责任分配原则不合理。本文试图通过对举证责任一般分配原则和特殊分配原则的分析,倡导如何运用特殊分配原则中的举证责任转移,以缓解当前举证责任分配中产生的矛盾。
The distribution of burden of proof is an important means of legal fact determined, it will directly affects the judge＇s heart confirm about the case facts, thereby affecting the final outcome of the trial. In order to strengthen IPR protection, optimized IPR judicial protection, determine the principle of distribution of the burden of proof more rational, we should pay attention to the application of the special distribution of the burden of proof when we applicate the general principles, it refers to based on the victim＇s legal protection reasons, the party who make the claim doesn＇t burden the responsibility of providing proof directly, but the opposition party should burden the proof of the exist of certain facts. If the opposition party can not provide relevant evidence, they have to bear the adverse consequences. Special allocation principles include the reverse and transfer of the burden of proof. This paper is mainly about the principle of the transfer of the burden of proof and expounds the applicable conditions of the principle from three aspects： the plaintiff must provide preliminary evidence of infringement, review whether the plaintiffs burden of proof means have been exhausted or not, and prove that one party hold the relevant and adverse evidence while do not provide.
出处
《电子知识产权》
2015年第12期40-49,共10页
Electronics Intellectual Property
关键词
举证责任分配
举证责任的一般分配原则
举证责任的特殊分配原则
举证责任转移
distribution of the burden of proof
general principle of the distribution of the burden of proof
specialprinciple of the distribution of the burden of proof
transfer of the burden of proof
