摘要
人类的认知就是要把握世界及其事物的本质,美学的根本问题只能是美的本质问题。"物何以美"的问题不过是美的本质问题的一个维度,即美的发生学维度。妄图以认识论维度来代替发生学维度,表明了一种哲学上的混乱和无知。依靠"认知模块"魔方来解释美的产生和存在,不过是康德主观唯心主义美学的翻版。李志宏的认知美学步康德美学的后尘,既没有解决任何问题,反而把美的产生和存在归结到人的认知,不过是美学研究的大倒退。
The cognition of human beings is intended to grasp the essence of the material world, while that of aesthetics is the nature of beauty. The question why there is such a thing as beauty is only one of the dimensions. However, epistemology cannot replace genesis, otherwise it was a philosophical confusion or ignorance. Therefore, the use of Rubik＇s cube to explain the existence of beauty is but a new version of Kant＇s subjective idealist aesthetics. Consequently, the cognitive approach by Li Zhihong can be nothing but a throwback of aesthetics.
出处
《河北师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
2015年第6期92-99,共8页
Journal of Hebei Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
