期刊文献+

不对称信任是进化还是回归?——西方管理学界信任研究新进展 被引量:3

Is Trust Asymmetry Evolution or Retrospect of Trust Research?The Western Trust Research New Progress Explore
原文传递
导出
摘要 20世纪90年代是管理界信任研究分水岭,信任完成第一阶段向第二阶段概念进化。千禧首十年,信任离差首度成为信任研究关注点,以不对称信任为核心的第三阶段信任概念正式建立,信任完成第二阶段向第三阶段进化。从2009年首次在AMJ上发表起,不对称信任已相继获得包括OS、SMJ、JAP在内指标期刊垂青。借助引文分析技术,本文重现了过去56年(1958—2013)来信任研究发展变迁;揭示不对称信任脱胎于信任研究的进化过程,以及对信任内核回归的显著特征。在分析第三阶段信任代际关系、内涵演进、主题发展基础上,探析了不对称视角下,信任研究的前沿热点和未来展望,以期为国内管理界信任研究发展提供新洞见。 1990s is the watershed of trust research in management when the definition of trust has evolved into a new generation.Meanwhile,the first decade of 21 st century,dispersion of trust has gained its importance to trust with the establishment of 3rd generation of trust,evolving from the 2nd generation.Thus far,the 3rd one has its position in the top journal including organization science,strategic management journal,journal of applied psychology.Based on the technique of bibliometrics,beyond the bias of previous review on trust research,we revisit the whole journey of 56 years of trust research development and manage to disclose the evolution of trust asymmetry from trust itself,including the retrospect of nature of trust.Outlining the relationships among generation of trust,connation change,and topic development,we then argue the fronts and expectation of trust research mainly from a trust-asymmetric-based perspective.Traditional trust research has taken trust as symmetric,reciprocal and mutual.However,trust and cheat often co-exist in the management filed.In most cases,one party can't have the same level of trust as the other party,and dyadic party has different interpretation to the same thing.This can be the reality in most cases.Thus,how to response to such trust asymmetry situation,and how to understand trust asymmetry,which constitute the hot topic in trust research at present,yet few people have concern on it.Trust is the basic factor facilitating relationship development.Though most scholars have deeply studied the antecedent and outcome of trust,they don' t know how to explain the different results from trust research,whereas trust asymmetry has been ignored.Gulati et al(2008) shows that trust asymmetry should be developed into a mature theory,so as to fill the gap left there by trust.Thus,our research hopes to focus on this topic,and contribute to it step by step.We prepared to publish a series of related research,and the first paper has been published on foreign economics and management.This is t
出处 《经济管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第12期185-193,共9页 Business and Management Journal ( BMJ )
基金 广东省软科学研究计划项目"广东创业投资家VS企业家:信任不对称关系格局驱动创业合作绩效的研究"(2015A070705002)
关键词 信任 不对称信任 变迁路径 引文分析法 trust trust asymmetry path of change citation analysis method
  • 相关文献

参考文献32

  • 1Aubert ,B. A. and B. L. Kelsey. Further Understanding of Trust and Performance in Virtual Teams[ J]. Small group research,2007,34,(5) :575 -618. 被引量:1
  • 2Brower, H. H. and F. D. Schoorman. A Model of Relational Leadership : The Integration of Trust and Leader-Member Exchange[J]. The Leadership Quarterly,2000,11, (2) :227 -250. 被引量:1
  • 3Blau’P. M. Exchange and Power in Social Life[ M]. Transaction Publishers, 1964. 被引量:1
  • 4Blau P M,Scott W R,Smith J H. Formal Organizations: A Comparative Approach[M]. American Sociological Review,2003. 被引量:1
  • 5Cole,M. S. and A. G. Bedeian. Dispersion Composition Models in Multilevel Research A Data Analytic Framework[ J]. Organ-izational Research Methods,2011,14,(4) :718 -734. 被引量:1
  • 6Colquitt,J. A. and B. A. Scott. Trust,Trustworthiness,and Trust Propensity: A Meta-Analytic Test of their Unique Relation-ships with Risk Taking and Job Performance[ J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,2007,92,(4) :909 -922. 被引量:1
  • 7Dirks,K. T. and D. L. Ferrin . Trust in Leadership:Meta-Analytic Findings and Implications for Research and Practice[ J].Journal of Applied Psychology,2002,87, (4) :611. 被引量:1
  • 8De Jong’B. A. and K. T. Dirks. Beyond Shared Perceptions of Trust and Monitoring in Teams:Implications of Asymmetry andDissensus[ J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,2012,97,(2) :391 -406. 被引量:1
  • 9Dineen,B. R. and R. A. Noe. Level and Dispersion of Satisfaction in Teams:Using Foci and Social Context to Explain the Sat-isfaction-Absenteeism Relationship[ J]. Academy of Management Journal,2007,50,(3) :623 -643. 被引量:1
  • 10De Jong’B. A. and T. Elfring. How does Trust Affect the Performance of Ongoing Teams? The Mediating Role of Reflexivity,Monitoring,and Effort[ J]. Academy of Management Journal,2010,53,(3) :535 -549. 被引量:1

同被引文献27

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部