期刊文献+

伪忽视行为表现与神经基础及交通驾驶应用 被引量:5

Behavior Performance and Neural Mechanism of Pseudoneglect and Its Transportation Application
下载PDF
导出
摘要 伪忽视是健康个体存在轻微偏左的不对称空间注意。影响这个现象的因素主要包括刺激材料、年龄、认知负荷和知觉负荷等。其中,眼动搜索习惯曾经被认为是伪忽视现象的主要因素,甚至提出伪忽视是眼动偏好现象。但是,最近丈献研究普遍认为,伪忽视不是眼动行为,而是注意特质。近10年的大脑神经层面的证据发现,右脑腹侧注意网络对左侧空间注意偏好有较大的贡献,而且在神经传导束的证据中也发现右脑大纵束二型对左侧空间注意的激活程度高于其他两种类型的传导束。另外,注意偏好的时间分辨率研究发现,注意的左侧空间偏向发生在注意发生后的100~200ms之内,眼动搜索时间则是在1500ms之内出现最大左偏。该现象的应用研究主要体现在交通驾驶员的注意能力和驾驶视觉搜索模式的关系研究。研究意义在于为安全交通提供两条原则,首先,道路交通驾驶环境设置要满足驾驶员的注意特质的需求:其次,通过合理干预,可以抑制视觉搜索习惯,培养安全的驾驶搜索模式。 Pseudoneglect is "healthy subjects tend to exhibit a subtle bias of visual attention favouring left space". There are many factors that affect pseudoneglect, such as stimulus, age, cognitive load and perceptual load. Among them, eye movement habit has been coded as the major factor to the explanation of pseudoneglect. However, recent neural studies exhibited that right hemisphere VAN contributed to pseudonegelct more than left hemisphere. The right hemisphere SLF Ⅱ corresponded to greater deviation to the left-hemi field than the other two SLF did. Moreover, pseudoneglect is occurred at time of 100-200 ms after stimulus displayed. While the duration time of visual searching is 1500 millisecond reaching to the greater left deviation. The application of current study is applied in the traffic driving to explore the relationship between drivers' attention trait and driving visual search. The results indicated that two principles of safety transportation might be recognized. First, the safety driving setting should be consistent with the drivers attention trait. Second, it is necessary to cultivate safety driving visual search model by the mean of inhibiting visual search habit through the theoretical visual intervention.
作者 郑新夷
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2015年第12期2085-2095,共11页 Advances in Psychological Science
关键词 伪忽视 注意偏好 神经机制 交通安全 pseudoneglect attentional bias neural mechanism transportation safety
  • 相关文献

参考文献42

  • 1张慧,施建农.无意视盲的认知神经机制[J].心理科学进展,2014,22(12):1867-1874. 被引量:4
  • 2赵欣,袁杰,徐依宁,傅世敏.基于物体的注意的机制与影响因素[J].心理科学进展,2014,22(11):1708-1722. 被引量:5
  • 3郭忠印, 方守恩等..道路安全工程[M],2003.
  • 4Aimola, L., Schindler, I., Simone, A. M., & Venneri, A. (2012). Near and far space neglect: task sensitivity and anatomical substrates. Neuropsychologia, 50(6): 1115-1123. 被引量:1
  • 5Benedetto, S., Pedrotti, M., Bremond, R., & Baccino, T. (2013). Leftward attentional bias in a simulated driving task. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 20, 147-153. 被引量:1
  • 6Benwell, C. S. Y., Harvey, M., & Thut, G. (2014). On the neural origin of pseudoneglect: EEG-correlates of shifts in line bisection performance with manipulation of line length. Neuroimage, 86, 370-380. 被引量:1
  • 7Benwell, C. S. Y., Thut, G., Learmonth, G., & Harvey, M. (2013). Spatial attention: Differential shiits in pseudoneglect direction with time-on-task and initial bias support the idea of observer subtypes. Neuropsychologia, 51, 2747-2756. 被引量:1
  • 8Brooks, J. L., Della Sala, S., & Darling, S. (2014). Representational pseudoneglect: A review. Neuropsyehology Review, 24, 148-165. 被引量:1
  • 9Charlton, S. G., & Starkey, N. J. (2011). Driving without awareness: The effects of practice and automaticity on attention and driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 14, 456-471. 被引量:1
  • 10iek, M., Deouell, L. Y., & Knight, R. T. (2009). Brain activity during landmark and line bisection tasks. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 3, 7. 被引量:1

二级参考文献129

  • 1李会杰,陈楚侨.注意捕获的另一扇窗户——无意视盲[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(4):577-586. 被引量:17
  • 2李会杰,沃建中,刘涵慧,赵丽琴.刺激类型及表征关系对无意视盲的影响[J].心理学报,2007,39(6):959-965. 被引量:7
  • 3Almeida, J., Mahon, B. Z., Nakayama, K., & Caramazza, A. (2008). Unconscious processing dissociates along categorical lines. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(39), 15214-15218. 被引量:1
  • 4Avrahami, J. (1999). Objects of attention, objects of perception.Perception & Psychophysics, 61(8), 1604-1612. 被引量:1
  • 5Bahrami, B., Lavie, N., & Rees, G. (2007). Attentional load modulates responses of human primary visual cortex to invisible stimuli. Current Biology, 17(6),509-513. 被引量:1
  • 6Baylis, G. C., & Driver, J. (1993). Visual attention and objects: Evidence for hierarchical coding of location. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19(3),451-470. 被引量:1
  • 7Baylis, G. C., Driver, J., & McLeod, P. (1992). Movement and proximity constrain miscombinations of colour and form. Perception, 21(2),201-218. 被引量:1
  • 8Brown, J. M., & Denney, H. I. (2007). Shifting attention into and out of objects: Evaluating the processes underlying the object advantage. Perception & Psychophysics, 69(4), 606-618. 被引量:1
  • 9Carter, 8., & Shomstein, S. (2013). When? What? The effect of temporal and identity uncertainty on Object-based attentional selection. Journal of Vision, 13(9), 142. 被引量:1
  • 10Chen, Z. (1998). Switching attention within and between objects: The role of subjective organization. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale, 52(1), 7-17. 被引量:1

共引文献7

同被引文献18

引证文献5

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部