摘要
马克思与韦伯关于社会治理的观点存在明显分歧。马克思提出,无产阶级在夺取国家政权和实现生产资料公有制的基础上建立公社制度,进行共同治理,现实条件下能够克服资本主义的经济和社会危机,极大地解放生产力,实现人的全面自由。韦伯则认为,共同治理模式存在低效和极权主义风险,而官僚治理作为理性主义化身,是现代社会治理模式演变的必然趋势。厘清马克思和韦伯社会治理思想的分歧,探讨产生这种分歧的时代背景,对当下创新社会治理模式,推进社会治理体系和治理能力的现代化,具有重要的意义。
Marx and Weber＇s perspectives on social governance are very different. Marx proposed that common governance model would overcome the crisis of economic and social capitalism, liberate the productivity greatly, and achieve the full freedom of human under realistic conditions. Weber pointed out that the common governance mode is inefficient and has the risk of the totalitarian. As the embodiment of the rationalism, bureaucracy is the inevitable trend of the modern social governance. It is of important reference value for the innovation of social governance model, and the promotion of the modernization of governance system and governance capacity.
出处
《南通大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第6期121-126,共6页
Journal of Nantong University:Social Sciences Edition
基金
教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(15YJC840015)
关键词
马克思
韦伯
共同治理
官僚治理
社会治理
Marx
Weber
common governance
bureaucratic governance
social governance
