摘要
劉勰"庖犧以來,未聞女帝者也"的判斷,並不如范文瀾所説是由於劉勰不以女媧爲女身,而是他本不以女媧爲三皇。劉勰在六種三皇説中選擇了《尚書僞孔傳序》的説法,一方面反映了他依據"文疑則闕,貴信史也"的原則,對當時受文學"愛奇"影響,對衆多敍述三代以上古史的"雜史"類著作具有"迂怪妄誕,真虚莫測"風格的批評,另一方面也説明劉勰畢竟是以經學作爲史學的裁斷標準。這種"立義選言,宜依經以樹則"的做法,與魏晉以來史學逐漸擺脱經學束縛而走向獨立的主流風氣是相背離的。
The reason why Liu Xie drew the conclusion that since the time of Paoxi,nobody has ever heard of a female ruler,is not that he didn't regard Nvwa as a female,but that he didn't include Nvwa into the Three Sovereigns. Among the six arguments of Three Sovereigns,Liu Xie decided to adopt the theory of Kong Anguo's. That fact not only indicates that Liu Xie criticized the unofficial ancient history books harshly which paid no attention either to facts or to what ought to be,according to his principle— "when in doubt,don't record,because it is essential to have reliable historical records" ,but also indicates that he measured the historiography problems by the criteria of Confucian Classics. In forming ideas and selecting words to express them,Liu Xie established his rules on the basis of the Classics,which was contrary to the contemporary trend of splitting the historiography away from the bondage of Confucian Classics.
出处
《中华文史论丛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第4期361-383,共23页
Journal of Chinese Literature and History
基金
山東省社會科學規劃研究項目"魏晉南北朝山東文學家族研究"(14DWXJ04)階段性成果
中國博士後科學基金資助項目"劉勰的知識譜系與<文心雕龍>撰述研究"(2013M530313)資助
